Skip to main content

Security report for weblab.lv

Web-Laboratory · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Web-Laboratory is a small Latvian IT service provider founded in 2014, specializing in IT outsourcing, consulting, and custom software development. The company positions itself as a full-service technical team offering architecture, design, software, custom solutions, and web scraping services. The website is professionally designed, targeting businesses seeking technical expertise to support their operations. The technical infrastructure leverages modern technologies including PHP, Symfony, MySQL, Bootstrap, AWS cloud hosting, and Serverless architecture, indicating a mature digital setup. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting the contact form, though the absence of explicit security headers and published privacy policies suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but client testimonials and professional presentation support legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates good technical and business maturity with moderate privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weblab.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT outsourcing and consulting services. Its business model revolves around providing tailored technical solutions to other businesses, supported by a mix of in-house and contractor resources. Market positioning is supported by a history of dozens of customers and hundreds of delivered solutions since 2014. The website highlights key services such as architecture, design, software development, custom solutions, and web scraping, appealing to businesses needing flexible and scalable IT support. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related domains or subsidiaries are identified. Growth indicators include ongoing client engagements and modernization efforts. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based and ongoing service contracts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated to protect form submissions from abuse. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not visible, limiting transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small IT service provider but would benefit from enhanced policies and headers to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including direct emails or phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process to enhance transparency and security culture.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and update them to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Web-Laboratory
Description
IT concierge: outsourcing & consulting, software development as a service.
Key services
Architecture, Design, Software, Custom solutions, Scraping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, MySQL, Symfony, Bootstrap v3.3.1, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Analytics, Serverless, AWS
Frameworks
Symfony, Bootstrap
Platforms
AWS, Serverless
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear service offerings
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policies found
  3. Contact only via form, no direct emails or phone numbers listed
  4. Uses modern web technologies and cloud hosting
  5. Security practices include HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lack explicit security headers
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  7. No social media or direct contact emails found
  8. No visible certifications or security policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including PHP with Symfony framework, MySQL database, Bootstrap for responsive design, and jQuery for client-side scripting. Hosting is cloud-based on AWS with Serverless architecture, indicating scalability and modern infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. The contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. However, the site lacks a CMS and explicit accessibility enhancements. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and improving privacy compliance would enhance the overall technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weblab.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weblab.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.