Skip to main content

Security report for webkrom.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

52/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.webkrom.cz is currently under reconstruction, providing minimal content with a clear notice and basic contact information including a phone number and email address. The site uses WordPress CMS with WooCommerce and Elementor plugins, indicating an e-commerce or business intent, but no active business content or services are currently presented. The technical infrastructure is modern with HTTPS enabled and integration of Google AdSense and tracking tools, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is in an early or transitional phase with limited business presence and low content maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webkrom.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the minimal content and lack of business description, it is difficult to ascertain the market positioning or business model of WebKrom. The presence of WooCommerce suggests e-commerce capabilities, but no products or services are currently visible. The contact information is limited but professional. No partnerships or certifications are disclosed. The site targets a general Czech audience but lacks clear branding or trust signals. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident at this stage.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. Incident response and security contact information are missing, reducing readiness for security events. The overall security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance website content with clear business information and trust indicators to improve credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website under reconstruction with contact invitation; no detailed business description present.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google AdSense
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress Stats (Jetpack), Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
WordPress Stats (Jetpack)
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is under reconstruction with minimal content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Contact information limited to one phone number and one email address.
  5. Uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor plugins.
  6. Includes Google AdSense and tracking scripts.
  7. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No business or legal information disclosed.
  9. No social media links found.
  10. No forms present on the page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using WooCommerce and Elementor, which are widely supported and flexible. The site loads moderate external resources including Google Fonts and AdSense scripts, which may impact performance slightly but provide monetization and styling capabilities. Mobile optimization is good, and basic accessibility features are present. However, SEO optimization is minimal with no structured data or Open Graph metadata detected. The site is currently in a maintenance or reconstruction state, limiting the assessment of full technical maturity. Hosting provider details are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webkrom.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webkrom.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.