Skip to main content

Security report for webhouse.sk

E-GO, s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WebHouse, operated by E-GO, s.r.o., is a Slovakian-based technology company specializing in domain registration, web hosting, and server services. The company positions itself as a reliable hosting provider managing over 56,000 domains with a strong emphasis on uptime and customer satisfaction. Their website offers multiple hosting packages tailored to different customer needs, supported by a professional and consistent brand presentation. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. Cookie consent is managed comprehensively through Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates and implements reCAPTCHA on forms, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the website is well-structured, user-friendly, and trustworthy, with clear contact channels and transparent business information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webhouse.sk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WebHouse operates in the technology sector, targeting individuals and businesses requiring domain and hosting services. Their business model is service-oriented, generating revenue through hosting packages, domain registrations, and server offerings. The company maintains partnerships with related service providers such as setup.sk and operates a dedicated helpdesk domain for customer support. Market positioning is solid within the regional hosting market, supported by trust signals like uptime guarantees and compliance with privacy regulations. The company demonstrates a mature digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools, indicating a focus on growth and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, SSL certificates, and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is granular and compliant with GDPR, managed via Cookiebot. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, suitable for the business scale but with opportunities for enhancement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a data protection officer contact or privacy team contact to strengthen GDPR compliance signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
E-GO, s.r.o.
Description
Domain registration and web hosting, this is WebHouse - the Home of Happy Domains. Hosting with 100% guaranteed uptime. We manage more than 56,000 domains.
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting, Virtual and dedicated servers, Business email
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.2.0, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, Cookiebot consent management
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Free SSL certificates for hosting

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Google Ads conversion tracking, Facebook tracking pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  3. Multiple hosting packages clearly described with pricing
  4. Contact phone number and newsletter subscription form present
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Facebook tracking pixels for marketing
  6. No signs of malware or phishing
  7. No exposed sensitive data or credentials
  8. No visible security.txt or explicit security policy page
  9. No explicit data protection officer contact found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 3.2.0 and integrates several third-party services including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern fonts and CSS. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts such as reCAPTCHA and analytics. The presence of legacy Bootstrap 3 indicates some technical debt but does not critically impact functionality. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure data transmission. Forms include spam protection via reCAPTCHA. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, and structured data is implemented via JSON-LD for the website entity. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webhouse.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webhouse.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.