Skip to main content

Security report for webgf.top

Other · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webgf.top is an adult content forum website primarily focused on hosting and sharing explicit adult videos, photos, and related content across various categories including celebrity content, amateur videos, and fetish photo sets. The site operates on the MyBB forum platform and targets an adult audience with explicit content warnings and age verification disclaimers. The business model appears to rely heavily on advertising and affiliate marketing through multiple external adult-oriented domains. Technically, the site uses jQuery libraries and Cloudflare DNS services but lacks advanced security headers and HTTPS enforcement in some scripts, which poses security risks. Privacy compliance is minimal with no visible privacy or terms of service policies, and cookie consent mechanisms are absent. The domain is newly registered with privacy protection, which is common for adult sites but reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site has basic design and navigation with moderate performance and mobile optimization but suffers from poor security posture and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webgf.top

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention webgf.top, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for webgf.top right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the adult entertainment market as a community-driven forum for sharing adult content. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive categorization and user engagement through forums. Revenue streams are primarily from advertising and affiliate marketing with multiple external adult sites. The target customer segment is adults seeking free adult content and community interaction. Growth indicators are limited due to the new domain age and lack of clear business identity. The partnership ecosystem includes several adult affiliate networks and ad providers, though many domains appear suspicious or low trust. Strategic observations suggest the site is focused on volume and affiliate monetization rather than building a trusted brand or compliance framework.

Security posture

The security maturity of webgf.top is low. The site lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. DNSSEC is not enabled, and HTTPS is inconsistently used in scripts. The presence of multiple third-party ad and affiliate scripts from suspicious domains increases the attack surface and risk of malware or tracking abuse. No incident response or security policies are published. Privacy compliance is poor with no GDPR indicators or data protection officer contact. The site is vulnerable to potential security and privacy risks, which could impact user trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and enforce HTTPS site-wide to improve domain and transport security.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden against common web attacks.
  4. Review and limit third-party ad and affiliate scripts to trusted sources to reduce security risks and improve transparency.
  5. Publish clear contact and incident response information including abuse and security contacts to enhance trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Webgf is an adult content forum website hosting various categories of adult videos, photos, and related content including celebrity content, non-nude content, collections, and adult video threads. It targets adult users interested in adult entertainment and explicit content.
Key services
Adult content forum, User-generated threads and posts, Affiliate marketing and advertising
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
MyBB, jQuery, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
MyBB forum software
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Histats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Histats, magsrv.com, a.magsrv.com
Tracking pixels
Histats
Marketing tools
Histats
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content forum with extensive categories and user-generated content.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service found on the site.
  3. Cookie policy is mentioned but no explicit consent mechanism is implemented.
  4. Multiple external affiliate and advertising links to adult and suspicious domains.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  6. WHOIS data is privacy protected and domain is very new.
  7. Site uses MyBB forum software with jQuery and Cloudflare DNS.
  8. Content is explicit adult material requiring age verification warning.
  9. Site performance and design are basic with moderate mobile optimization.
  10. No official company contact emails or phone numbers found.
Technical notes

Notes

The site runs on MyBB forum software with jQuery libraries and uses Cloudflare for DNS. The HTML structure is basic with some inline scripts and multiple iframe ads from external ad networks. Performance is moderate but could be improved with better resource management and HTTPS enforcement. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO and accessibility features are minimal. The site shows signs of technical debt with outdated or insecure script references and lack of modern security practices. Modernization opportunities include upgrading to HTTPS everywhere, implementing security headers, and improving privacy compliance frameworks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webgf.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webgf.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.