Skip to main content

Security report for webfuse.com

Webfuse · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webfuse is an enterprise-grade SaaS platform specializing in augmented web proxy technology that enables developers and organizations to modify and extend web applications without altering source code. The platform targets developers and enterprises seeking flexible, no-code web augmentation solutions, offering features such as virtual web sessions, automation workflows, multi-factor authentication, and real-time collaboration. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, emphasizing compliance with major security frameworks like SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001, and HIPAA, and claims trust from Fortune 500 companies and global organizations. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS and integrates modern JavaScript libraries such as Vimeo Player API, Swiper.js, and analytics tools including Segment, Google Tag Manager, and Plausible Analytics. Hosting and CDN services are provided via Cloudflare and AWS infrastructure. While the site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices, performance metrics indicate slow loading times, possibly due to large media assets and third-party scripts. From a security perspective, the site implements several HTTP security headers and cookie flags, but critically lacks a valid SSL certificate and proper TLS protocol support, severely undermining HTTPS security. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information is provided, and privacy and cookie policies are absent, which impacts compliance posture. DNS records and WHOIS data indicate a legitimate and consistent domain registration without privacy protection, supporting the business's credibility. Overall, Webfuse demonstrates strong business credibility and technical sophistication but must urgently address SSL/TLS implementation and privacy compliance to improve security posture and user trust. Strategic recommendations include installing a valid SSL certificate, enabling modern TLS protocols, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and adding explicit contact information for security incidents.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webfuse.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Webfuse operates in the technology sector as a SaaS provider focused on web application augmentation and proxy services. Its competitive advantage lies in enabling no-code, installation-free customization of existing web applications, appealing to enterprises requiring rapid prototyping, automation, and secure collaboration. The business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting large enterprises, including Fortune 500 companies. The platform's compliance with major security standards positions it well for regulated industries. The company leverages partnerships with cloud and CDN providers and integrates popular analytics and marketing tools to optimize user engagement and product development. Growth indicators include advanced API offerings and AI-driven automation capabilities. However, the absence of direct contact information and incomplete privacy disclosures may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

Webfuse exhibits a moderate security maturity level with strong policy and compliance claims but significant technical gaps. The presence of strict transport security headers and content security policies indicates awareness of best practices. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential man-in-the-middle attacks and data interception. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption further weakens TLS security and performance. No vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency and incident response readiness. Privacy compliance is minimal due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security culture appears focused on compliance frameworks but requires urgent technical remediation to align with industry standards and protect user data effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable secure HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and strong cipher suites.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add explicit contact information for security incidents and vulnerability disclosures, including a security.txt file.
  5. Optimize website performance by auditing third-party scripts and media assets to improve load times and user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and incorporates modern JavaScript libraries such as Vimeo Player API for video content and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. Analytics and marketing integrations include Segment Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Plausible Analytics, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Hosting is provided via Cloudflare CDN and AWS infrastructure in the eu-south-1 region, ensuring global availability and scalability. Despite good mobile optimization and accessibility features, performance metrics are poor with zero load time and resource count reported, suggesting incomplete performance data or slow loading. The site uses advanced CSS and JavaScript for UI/UX enhancements but lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical technical debt. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires improvements in security configuration and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webfuse.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webfuse.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.