Skip to main content

Security report for weberp.lv

SIA DB Risinājumi · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA DB Risinājumi is a Latvia-based IT company specializing in the development and maintenance of web-based information systems, primarily serving businesses in the logistics and transport sectors. With over 17 years of experience, the company offers tailored IT solutions focusing on maritime and land transport digitalization. Their business model centers on delivering customized web applications using open-source technologies, targeting Latvian enterprises requiring specialized logistics and business process systems. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Yii2, PHP, MySQL, and front-end libraries such as jQuery and AJAX. The infrastructure appears to be Linux and Apache based. The site design is professional with good navigation and mobile optimization, though some accessibility and SEO aspects could be improved. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, but no visible cookie consent or privacy policies are present, indicating gaps in privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adding security headers, privacy policies, and incident response information. The overall risk is moderate with no critical issues detected. Strategic recommendations include improving privacy compliance, implementing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and enhancing WHOIS transparency to build greater trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weberp.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche market in Latvia providing specialized IT solutions for logistics and transport companies. Their competitive advantage lies in deep domain expertise and long-standing experience (17+ years) in this sector. The business model is project and service-based, focusing on custom web application development and system maintenance. Revenue streams likely come from software development contracts and ongoing support services. The target customers are medium to small enterprises in maritime and land transport logistics. Growth indicators include a stable client base and multiple specialized systems delivered. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or partner domains were identified. The company maintains a professional online presence but lacks visible certifications or trust badges that could enhance credibility.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is not documented, and no security contact channels are provided. Data protection practices are unclear due to missing policies. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but the absence of security best practices and transparency reduces overall security posture. The security culture appears basic with room for improvement in compliance and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and accurate to strengthen domain trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA DB Risinājumi
Description
SIA DB Risinājumi is a Latvia-based IT solutions company specializing in web-based IT systems for businesses, with a focus on logistics, transport, and business process digitalization.
Key services
Web-based company information systems development, Information systems maintenance and modernization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Yii2, PHP, MySQL, AJAX, JQUERY, APACHE, LINUX, SPHINX
Frameworks
Yii2, Bootstrap 5 (commented out)
Platforms
Linux, Apache
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  3. Contact information is limited but present in footer (email and phone).
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no domain registration details extracted.
  5. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks but lacks some security headers.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. Business is a small Latvian IT company specializing in logistics and transport IT solutions.
  8. No visible security or incident response policies published.
  9. No certifications or trust badges displayed.
  10. Website design and navigation are good and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a solid technology stack including Yii2 PHP framework, MySQL database, and front-end technologies like AJAX and jQuery. The use of open-source technologies and Linux/Apache platform indicates a standard LAMP stack environment. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations noted. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons for UI consistency. Some commented-out Bootstrap 5 references suggest partial or legacy framework usage. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom-built solution. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance features. Modernization opportunities include improving accessibility, SEO, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weberp.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weberp.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.