Skip to main content

Security report for webees.cz

značkárna s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

značkárna s.r.o. is a Czech Republic based small business specializing in branding, communication, design, and digital development services. The company positions itself as a craftsman of communication and design, targeting businesses seeking to build and enhance their brand identity. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a clear presentation of their team and client portfolio. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, leveraging modern tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google Maps API, with lazy loading for images to optimize performance. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, but could improve in privacy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webees.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche market of branding and design services, focusing on personalized and collaborative client relationships. Their portfolio includes diverse clients from furniture to healthcare and digital applications, indicating a versatile service offering. The business model is service-oriented with direct client engagement. The presence of multiple office locations in Czech Republic suggests regional coverage. The company demonstrates growth potential with a stable domain age and consistent branding. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks as the company grows or targets EU clients more aggressively.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party services for analytics and tag management, which is positive. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The site does not appear to expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries visibly. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  5. Review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize tracking footprint.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
značkárna s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ29184550
Registration number
29184550
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
značkárna s.r.o.
Description
Značka je vztah, jednoduše na něm spolu pracujeme. Jsme řemeslníci komunikace, designu a vývoje. Jsme značkárna.
Key services
branding, visual identity design, digital product development, communication strategy, user interface design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, jQuery, WordPress, LazySizes (lazy loading images), Autoptimize plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple emails and phone numbers.
  4. The site uses modern web technologies and is built on WordPress.
  5. Security headers are missing, which is a potential improvement area.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking without visible cookie consent.
  7. Business registration details are transparently displayed.
  8. Content is professional, focused on branding and design services.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.1.9 with jQuery 3.6.1 and uses the Autoptimize plugin for asset optimization. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes, and Google Maps API for location display. LazySizes library is used for efficient image lazy loading. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph, Twitter cards). Hosting is provided by REG-GRANSY as indicated by nameservers. Performance is moderate with some optimization in place. Accessibility is basic and could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webees.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webees.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.