Skip to main content

Security report for web25.io

Web25 · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Web25 is a technology company offering affordable website design and integrated business tools on a subscription basis, targeting new businesses and entrepreneurs. Their market position emphasizes cost savings compared to established SaaS competitors by bundling multiple services such as review management, AI chatbots, email automation, and CRM into one platform. The website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The technical infrastructure is solid with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and asynchronous loading of tracking scripts, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching web25.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Web25 operates a subscription SaaS business model focused on small businesses needing affordable digital presence and business automation tools. Their competitive advantage lies in bundling multiple business SaaS tools at discounted prices, appealing to cost-conscious startups and entrepreneurs. The referral program indicates an active marketing strategy to grow user base. The absence of detailed company information and public WHOIS data suggests privacy protection is used, common in tech startups. The company targets a niche market segment with a clear value proposition but lacks visible certifications or compliance attestations that could enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities in the provided content. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security contact information is published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, reducing trust for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and demonstrate security commitment.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Web25
Description
We help New Businesses get an affordable Website Design for a Small Monthly Fee. Get 14 days free trial now.
Key services
Website Design Subscription, Review Management, AI Chatbots, Email Automation Workflows, Calendar & Booking, Social Scheduler, Invoicing & Payments System, CRM
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Webflow CMS, LeadConnectorHQ Chat Widget, Google Fonts (Inter)
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Tag Manager and Analytics implemented asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
LeadConnectorHQ Chat Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers bundled SaaS business tools targeting new businesses.
  2. No public WHOIS data available; privacy protection in place.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and third-party analytics.
  6. Referral program is prominently advertised.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow's platform, leveraging modern web fonts and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts for performance. The tech stack includes Google Tag Manager and LeadConnectorHQ chat widget for marketing and customer engagement. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and resource management. The absence of server-side security headers and limited compliance documentation are technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall site robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with web25.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review web25.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.