Skip to main content

Security report for weareled.fr

LED · Technology · France

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LED is a French digital agency specializing in designing, developing, and optimizing digital products such as websites, e-commerce platforms, and applications. As a subsidiary of Groupe Les Enchanteurs, LED positions itself as a user-centric agency with expertise in digital strategy, UX/UI design, development, and project management. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting organizations and brands seeking digital transformation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with integrations of modern frameworks like Laravel, React, and Next.js, hosted by OVH. It employs Google Tag Manager and Axeptio for analytics and cookie consent, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks explicit security headers and formal security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-structured, and compliant with GDPR, though it could improve by publishing detailed security policies and vulnerability disclosure information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weareled.fr

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LED operates in the competitive digital agency market in France, leveraging its affiliation with Groupe Les Enchanteurs to enhance credibility. Its business model focuses on providing end-to-end digital services including strategy, design, development, and project management. The agency targets medium to large organizations and territories undergoing digital transformation. The presence of client references and testimonials supports its market positioning. The use of modern technologies and frameworks suggests a commitment to innovation and quality delivery. The partnership ecosystem includes its parent company and external platforms for analytics and consent management. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active content updates.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via Axeptio. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, which could limit external reporting of security issues. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Axeptio requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small digital agency but could be enhanced with formal policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to increase transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize supply chain vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LED
Description
LED is a digital agency that designs, develops, and optimizes digital products and services that attract and engage key audiences. They offer services including websites, e-commerce, and applications.
Key services
Digital strategy, UX Research & UI design, Front & back-end development, Project management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Prestashop, Laravel, React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Axeptio (cookie consent), GSAP (animation), Owl Carousel
Frameworks
Laravel, React, Next.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear business focus on digital agency services.
  3. Good integration of cookie consent and analytics tools.
  4. No signs of security blocking or WAF interference.
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided and verified.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response info found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built primarily on WordPress CMS, supplemented by modern frameworks such as Laravel, React, and Next.js for advanced front-end and back-end development. Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable French provider. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and Axeptio for cookie consent management, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with use of CDN resources from cdnjs and jsdelivr. The site includes advanced animations powered by GSAP and carousel functionality via Owl Carousel. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are well implemented. Technical risks include the absence of certain security headers and potential dependency on third-party scripts. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting the agency's digital service offerings effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weareled.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weareled.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.