Skip to main content

Security report for wct.link

Data Protected · Other · United States

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website wct.link serves primarily as a customer support portal, offering navigation to billing, technical support, and contact pages. The site is basic in design and content, focusing on functional support rather than marketing or business promotion. The domain is registered since 2014 with privacy protection, which limits transparency about the registrant but indicates some maturity. The technical infrastructure is simple, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with external resources loaded from cdn.x1cdn.com. No advanced frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers or policies, and no HTTPS status was determinable from the data provided. The site lacks privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and trust. No contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly provided, limiting direct communication channels.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wct.link

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind wct.link appears to be a support service provider, likely for a product or service associated with the domain. The lack of explicit business information, branding, or certifications suggests a small-scale operation or a support subdomain rather than a primary business site. The target audience is customers seeking support. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on customer assistance. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The domain's US registration and age support a legitimate presence but privacy protection reduces transparency. The site does not leverage marketing or analytics tools, indicating limited digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

Security measures on the website are minimal. The domain does not have DNSSEC enabled, which is a recommended best practice. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected. The site does not display privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of HTTPS status in the data is a concern; if HTTPS is not enforced, this is a critical security issue. Overall, the security posture is weak and improvements are needed to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Provide clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to enhance communication and incident response.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Data Protected
Description
The website appears to provide customer support services, including billing, technical support, and contact options. It is likely a support portal for a service or product but lacks explicit business description or branding.
Key services
billing support, technical support, contact support
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a customer support portal with limited business information.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Domain uses privacy protection, which reduces transparency.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Content is safe and non-adult.
  9. Website design and content are basic and functional but lack professionalism.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with external resources served from cdn.x1cdn.com. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site structure is simple and functional but lacks modern technical features such as responsive design or accessibility enhancements. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and external CDN usage. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal data collection. The domain is registered with eNom, Inc., a reputable registrar, but DNSSEC is not enabled. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wct.link. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wct.link.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.