Skip to main content

Security report for wburfestival.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.wburfestival.org represents a festival event, likely related to arts or media, hosted on the Wix platform. The site content is minimal and primarily technical, with no detailed business descriptions or contact information available. The technical infrastructure relies on Wix's hosting and includes third-party tracking scripts such as Facebook Pixel and StackAdapt. The website lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security posture is weak due to absence of security headers and no public incident response or security policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed request or privacy protection, limiting trust and legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site appears to be a small-scale event site with basic technical implementation but lacks transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wburfestival.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the website appears to be a small entity organizing or promoting a festival, possibly in the arts or media sector. The use of Wix suggests a limited technical team or budget. There is no clear information on market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. The absence of contact details and business information limits the ability to assess competitive advantages or growth indicators. The site targets a general audience interested in the festival but does not provide detailed engagement or conversion mechanisms.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the provided content. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The WHOIS data is not accessible, which may be due to privacy protection but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web security issues and lacks a formal security framework.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Publish contact information including emails and phone numbers for transparency and trust.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Sentry, Facebook Pixel, StackAdapt
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Sentry
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Sentry
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and resources.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to malformed request or privacy protection.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found in the HTML content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  5. No security or incident response policies publicly disclosed.
  6. Website uses Facebook Pixel and StackAdapt for tracking and advertising.
  7. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in the HTML content.
  9. Website content is minimal and mostly technical scripts and styles; no rich business content found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Wix, leveraging its hosting and content management capabilities. It includes third-party scripts for error monitoring (Sentry) and advertising/tracking (Facebook Pixel, StackAdapt). The site uses modern polyfills and performance APIs but lacks advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are minimal. The site does not expose sensitive data but lacks security best practices such as security headers and HTTPS enforcement visible in the content. Technical debt appears low due to reliance on Wix but opportunities exist to improve security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wburfestival.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wburfestival.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.