Skip to main content

Security report for wargaming.com

Wargaming · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wargaming is a well-established online game developer and publisher, recognized as a leader in the free-to-play MMO market. The company offers a portfolio of popular games such as World of Tanks and World of Warships, targeting gamers worldwide as well as potential job applicants and partners. The website serves as a corporate and recruitment portal, providing company news, career opportunities, and partnership information. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including React, and integrates common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, implements standard security headers, and uses a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information. Overall, the domain registration data supports the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the business, with a long domain age and consistent WHOIS information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wargaming.com

This scan found 23 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wargaming operates in the technology sector focusing on online gaming development and publishing. The company has a strong market position as a leader in free-to-play MMO games, with a business model centered on game development, publishing, and community engagement. The website targets gamers, job seekers, and partners, indicating a diversified audience. The presence of multiple game titles and career resources suggests a large organizational structure. The company maintains partnerships and offers corporate social responsibility initiatives. The business intelligence indicates a mature company with a global reach and a focus on innovation and community building.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present. The domain is secured with clientTransferProhibited status, reducing the risk of unauthorized transfers. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and incident response information, and adding a vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify legal terms and user agreements.
  5. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wargaming
Description
Wargaming is an award-winning online game developer and publisher, and one of the leaders in the free-to-play MMO market.
Key services
online game development, game publishing, career opportunities, partner offers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited status on domain
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  4. Social media links are present but URLs are placeholders (#).
  5. Site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and tracking technologies.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages detected.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. WHOIS data indicates a well-established domain with good security status.
  9. Content is professional and targeted at gamers and job applicants.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based front-end framework, integrating third-party scripts for analytics and marketing such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but the domain registrar is reputable. The site lacks a CMS indication, suggesting a custom-built solution. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence with opportunities for further optimization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wargaming.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wargaming.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.