Skip to main content

Security report for wantedbabes.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WantedBabes.com is an adult entertainment website offering explicit photo galleries and videos featuring various sexual content. The site operates primarily through affiliate marketing and content subscriptions, targeting adult audiences seeking hardcore and lesbian adult material. The website is moderately well designed with mobile optimization and basic SEO, but lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies. Technically, it uses standard web technologies like jQuery and Google Fonts, but lacks advanced security headers and visible compliance measures. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises significant legitimacy concerns, impacting trust and business credibility. Overall, the site presents moderate technical maturity but weak compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wantedbabes.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself in the niche adult entertainment market with a focus on photo galleries and videos. It leverages affiliate partnerships with well-known adult content providers such as Silkengirl and Playboy Plus to monetize traffic. The business model relies on content updates and affiliate discounts to attract and retain users. The lack of clear company information, contact details, and privacy policies limits transparency and may hinder user trust and regulatory compliance. The site appears to be a small-scale operation without evident parent company or subsidiaries.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no visible security headers like CSP or HSTS. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure, incident response contacts, or data protection officer information. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR and other privacy regulations compliance. The missing WHOIS data is a major red flag, suggesting possible domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified. Overall, the site has moderate security risks and compliance gaps that should be addressed to improve trustworthiness and reduce legal exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  2. Add visible contact information including business email and phone for support and security incidents.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Verify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and incident response contact to enhance security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
WantedBabes.com is an adult entertainment website featuring explicit photo galleries and videos of women engaging in various sexual activities, including solo, hardcore, and lesbian content. The site offers a large archive of adult content with frequent updates and promotes affiliate discounts for related adult sites.
Key services
Adult photo galleries, Adult videos, Affiliate promotions for adult sites, Free cams integration
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Fonts (Roboto Slab), HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://www.wantedbabes.com/)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Clickadu
Tracking pixels
Google site verification
Marketing tools
Google Fonts, Clickadu
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content portal with explicit material.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided for business or support.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  5. Site uses HTTPS and loads external scripts and fonts.
  6. Affiliate marketing and advertising are prominent.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  8. Mobile optimized with responsive meta tags and touch icons.
  9. Search form uses POST method but no visible anti-bot protections.
  10. Multiple external adult content partner and affiliate domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack including jQuery and Google Fonts, with standard HTML5 and CSS3. It is mobile optimized with responsive meta tags and touch icons. Performance appears moderate with external content delivery from subdomains. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and SEO optimizations are basic. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or progressive web app features. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wantedbabes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wantedbabes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.