Skip to main content

Security report for waff.at

Wiener Arbeitnehmer*innen Förderungsfonds · Government · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Wiener Arbeitnehmer*innen Förderungsfonds (waff) is a government-affiliated organization dedicated to supporting the workforce in Vienna through information, consultation, and financial assistance for professional development and training. The website serves as a comprehensive portal offering access to job and course searches, funding programs, and online applications, targeting both individuals and companies in Vienna. The organization holds a significant regional position as a key instrument in active labor market policies and adult education. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, uses Matomo for analytics, and Borlabs Cookie for privacy management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, a critical security gap exists due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential risks. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professionally designed, content-rich, and trustworthy but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching waff.at

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The waff operates as a public fund under the City of Vienna, focusing on workforce development and employment promotion. Its business model revolves around providing subsidies and advisory services to employees and employers, facilitating career advancement and workforce integration. The website reflects a well-structured ecosystem with multiple service subdomains and partnerships, notably with AMS for job listings. The organization's market positioning is strong within Vienna's labor market, leveraging digital tools for outreach and service delivery. Growth indicators include active event promotion, podcasts, and extensive online resources. The partnership ecosystem includes governmental and educational entities, enhancing credibility and reach. Strategic observations suggest a focus on inclusivity, digital transformation, and sustainability in workforce development.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS, which is a fundamental requirement for secure web communication. While no vulnerable SSL protocols or known exploits are detected, the absence of encryption exposes users to interception and data tampering risks. Security headers are minimal, and advanced protections like HSTS and OCSP stapling are not implemented. The site uses secure cookie management tools and privacy consent frameworks, indicating awareness of privacy best practices. Incident response and security policy disclosures are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the site requires immediate SSL deployment and enhancement of security headers to meet modern standards and protect user data effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide to secure user data and improve trust.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an nginx server with a WordPress CMS enhanced by Elementor for page building. It integrates Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious user tracking and Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site loads jQuery libraries and uses lazy loading for images to optimize performance. Despite these modern technologies, the absence of HTTPS severely impacts security and user trust. Performance metrics are not provided, but the site appears well-structured and mobile-optimized. The DNS setup is standard with no DNSSEC or CAA records, which could be improved for enhanced domain security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires critical security upgrades and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with waff.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review waff.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.