Skip to main content

Security report for waasabi.io

Daxia · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Daxia operates as an embedded finance platform enabling businesses across multiple industries to integrate fintech solutions such as payments, collections, and rewards into their digital ecosystems. Positioned as a fintech accelerator, it offers strategic advisory, API-based fintech services, crypto asset management, and tokenization solutions. The company is affiliated with Globant, a recognized technology consulting firm, enhancing its market credibility. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for consent management, but suffers from slow load times and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which critically impacts security and user trust. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS, security headers, and advanced email protection policies. Privacy compliance is basic with presence of privacy and terms policies but no explicit GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate business credibility but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching waasabi.io

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
95
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Daxia targets businesses in sectors such as banking, retail, e-commerce, energy, and telecommunications, aiming to open fintech opportunities to non-traditional players. Its business model revolves around providing embedded finance solutions via APIs and strategic consulting, enabling clients to create and manage fintech products rapidly. The partnership ecosystem includes Globant and other fintech-related companies, which strengthens its market position. The company leverages digital marketing and tracking tools to engage prospects but lacks direct contact details, relying on a contact form. Growth indicators include participation in industry events and alliances with recognized partners. The platform's focus on security and compliance is minimal, which could impact customer confidence and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak, primarily due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are implemented, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. Email security is minimal with a DMARC policy set to 'none' and no DNSSEC or CAA records configured. The site uses SPF records including Google and Salesforce, which is positive. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, and no dedicated security contact channels are found. The use of Usercentrics indicates some attention to privacy consent, but overall compliance and security best practices need significant enhancement to meet industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Configure and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enhance email security by upgrading DMARC policy to quarantine or reject and enable DNSSEC and CAA records.
  4. Improve website performance by optimizing resources to reduce load time and page size.
  5. Publish clear security and incident response policies including dedicated security contact information to build trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an AWS IP address and uses modern frontend technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management. The site loads slowly with over 31 seconds load time and a large page size of approximately 316 KB. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. No CMS or backend frameworks are explicitly identified. The lack of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. The DNS configuration is standard with Azure DNS nameservers and valid SPF records, but no DNSSEC or CAA records. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with waasabi.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review waasabi.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.