Skip to main content

Security report for vurdst.dk

Vurderingsstyrelsen · Government · Denmark

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vurderingsstyrelsen is a Danish government agency responsible for providing accurate and transparent property valuations to homeowners. The website serves as an official platform to communicate their services and ensure compliance with data protection regulations. The site targets Danish property owners and operates within the government sector, offering valuation services through a modern digital interface. The domain age and WHOIS data confirm the legitimacy and consistency of the agency's online presence. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, ensuring good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting a mature approach to privacy. External links predominantly point to trusted government and service provider domains, reinforcing the site's credibility. From a security perspective, while HTTPS is implied and cookie consent is well managed, the site lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and no critical vulnerabilities were found in the accessible content. The overall security posture is good but could be improved with additional security best practices. Overall, Vurderingsstyrelsen's website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting its role as a government service provider. Strategic improvements in security policies and technical headers would further enhance its security and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vurdst.dk

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
75
Email security
100
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vurdst.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
33%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for vurdst.dk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency holds a strong market position as the official property valuation authority in Denmark, serving a critical function for homeowners and real estate stakeholders. Its business model is government-funded, focusing on transparency and accuracy in property assessments. The website reflects a medium-sized government entity with a clear target audience and key services centered on property valuation. The presence of social media links indicates engagement with the public, while the absence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its public service mandate. The agency's partnerships appear to be primarily with government and trusted technology providers, supporting its operational infrastructure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed with detailed disclosures and links to privacy policies. However, the absence of explicit security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government site but would benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance transparency by adding clear contact information for general and security inquiries on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vurderingsstyrelsen
Description
Vurderingsstyrelsen sikrer, at alle boligejere får en mere retvisende og gennemskuelig ejendomsvurdering med et nyt vurderingssystem.
Key services
Property valuation, Providing transparent and accurate property assessments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie info
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Dynatrace
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic, Dynatrace, Adobe Experience Cloud, AppDynamics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official Danish government property valuation agency site.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent banner with detailed cookie information and links to privacy policies.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage HTML.
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  5. Use of modern web technologies (Next.js, React).
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  7. WHOIS data consistent with government entity and domain age appropriate.
  8. Multiple external domains linked mostly to government and trusted service providers.
  9. Good GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy references.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack with Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and good performance. CSS and JavaScript assets are properly loaded with preloading hints, indicating attention to performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as focus outlines and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for improvement in security headers and hosting transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vurdst.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vurdst.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.