Skip to main content

Security report for vulkanvegas.dk

Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vulkan Vegas is a newly launched online casino platform targeting the Danish market, offering a wide range of casino games including poker, slots, blackjack, roulette, and live casino games. The website presents itself as a leading online casino with a professional design and consistent branding. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging React and Next.js frameworks, and integrates common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, and no explicit contact or security incident response information is provided. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vulkanvegas.dk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the online gambling sector, focusing on the Danish audience with multilingual support for other regions. The business model revolves around providing casino gaming services online, monetized likely through player deposits and gaming activity. The site shows signs of a large-scale operation given the professional design and extensive game offerings, but the domain age is very recent, indicating a new market entry or brand launch. The lack of detailed business registration or contact information limits deeper business intelligence. The presence of multiple alternate domains suggests a broader international strategy. The company leverages popular tracking and marketing tools to optimize user acquisition and engagement.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks DNSSEC which could improve domain name system security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are found, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces potential privacy risks, especially without clear cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, DNSSEC, and transparent privacy and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Vulkan Vegas er et førende online casino, der tilbyder alle former for kasinospil. Spil poker, slots, blackjack, roulette eller live-spil - vi har noget, der vil overraske dig!
Key services
Poker, Slots, Blackjack, Roulette, Live casino games
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security icons and responsible gaming badges

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a newly launched online casino targeting Danish players
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found or labeled
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  5. No WAF or blocking detected, site fully accessible
  6. Security headers and advanced security policies are missing
  7. WHOIS data shows recent domain registration with no privacy protection
  8. Multiple language alternate URLs indicate international targeting
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, which support server-side rendering and improved performance. The site loads multiple asynchronous JavaScript chunks and uses popular analytics and marketing tools. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate with preloading of key assets. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and hreflang attributes for multilingual support. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which could expose the site to certain attacks. The domain is very new, which may imply limited historical data or reputation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vulkanvegas.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vulkanvegas.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.