Skip to main content

Security report for vsbl.lt

VSBL Studio · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VSBL Studio is a Lithuanian-based digital agency specializing in premium UX/UI design and web development services, including e-commerce solutions. The company positions itself as a provider of holistic digital solutions for businesses aiming to enhance their online presence. Recently, VSBL Studio announced a rebranding and integration into the Synthesis Consulting group family under the name NEAT Digital Studio, indicating strategic growth and partnership expansion. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Hotjar, providing a smooth user experience and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of security headers and explicit privacy policies suggests room for improvement. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, though contact information is not explicitly provided on the homepage, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vsbl.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vsbl.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for vsbl.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector as a small digital agency focused on UX/UI and web development services targeting businesses seeking premium digital solutions. Its business model revolves around project-based client engagements, delivering custom websites and e-commerce platforms. The recent rebranding and partnership with Synthesis Consulting group suggest strategic positioning to expand market reach and service offerings. The company maintains an active social media presence across multiple platforms, enhancing brand visibility and client engagement. The portfolio showcases reputable clients, reinforcing its market credibility. Revenue streams likely derive from design and development contracts. The lack of explicit contact details on the website may impact lead generation and client trust. Overall, VSBL Studio demonstrates a solid foundation with growth potential through its new partnership.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published privacy policy, terms of service, or security incident contact channels limits transparency and compliance with GDPR and other data protection frameworks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The use of third-party tracking tools like Hotjar and Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, which should be clearly disclosed in privacy documentation. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but would benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VSBL Studio
Description
Esame skaitmeninės kūrybos ir dizaino specialistų komanda, kurianti premium klasės interneto svetaines ir elektronines parduotuves.
Key services
UX design, UI design, Web development, E-commerce development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Finsweet Cookie Consent, jQuery, WebFont Loader, Lenis smooth scroll
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and tracking tools
  7. Branding consistent and professional
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source
  9. No visible forms on homepage for direct contact
  10. Social media presence is strong with multiple platforms linked
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, WebFont Loader, and Lenis for smooth scrolling. Google Tag Manager and Hotjar are integrated for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site loads CSS and fonts from Google Fonts and CDN providers, indicating a distributed content delivery approach. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. No CMS-specific vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. The absence of security headers is a technical gap. The site’s technical infrastructure supports a professional digital agency presence but could be improved with enhanced security and privacy configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vsbl.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vsbl.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.