Skip to main content

Security report for vratimov.cz

Město Vratimov · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Město Vratimov operates as the official municipal government website for the town of Vratimov in the Czech Republic, providing residents and visitors with comprehensive information about local governance, community services, events, and public notices. The site serves as a central hub for municipal communication, offering access to official documents, social services, and contact channels. The business model is focused on public service delivery and community engagement within a small government entity context. Technically, the website employs a mix of established web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js, indicating a moderately modern infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and features a clear navigation structure, although it appears to use a custom or proprietary CMS platform. Performance is moderate, with no significant technical issues detected in the provided content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially impacting trust in the domain registration legitimacy. However, the website content and official contact information strongly support its authenticity as a municipal government site. Overall, the site presents a good user experience and trustworthy content for its intended audience, but would benefit from enhanced transparency regarding privacy, security policies, and domain registration details to improve its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vratimov.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Město Vratimov as a local government authority serving the community of Vratimov. Its competitive advantage lies in providing centralized access to municipal services, official documentation, and community engagement tools. The business model is non-commercial, focused on governance and public service. Revenue streams are not applicable as it is a government entity. Target customers include residents, local businesses, and visitors. Growth indicators include active updates on community events and social services. The partnership ecosystem includes regional social service providers and local media. Strategic observations suggest a stable municipal operation with opportunities to enhance digital transparency and security compliance.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site benefits from HTTPS encryption and cookie consent but lacks comprehensive security headers and published privacy or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance gaps exist in GDPR transparency and security best practices. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and technical defenses. Business impact of current gaps is moderate, primarily affecting trust and compliance rather than immediate operational risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen technical security posture.
  3. Establish and publicize incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Vratimov
Description
Oficiální stránky Obce Vratimov
Key services
Municipal news and updates, Public notices and official documents, Community planning and development, Social and care services, Sport and cultural event information, Contact and administrative services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper.js, Font Awesome, jQuery Migrate, Highslide JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive for a municipal government site with extensive navigation and official documents.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trustworthiness.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented with official email and phone.
  9. Site uses multiple external trusted CDNs and libraries.
  10. Mobile optimization and navigation are good.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Swiper.js, and Font Awesome, indicating a moderately modern front-end technology stack. The CMS appears custom or specialized for municipal use, which may limit flexibility but suits the site's purpose. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. Technical debt is minimal but could be reduced by updating libraries and improving accessibility compliance. The lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that could impact business operations and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vratimov.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vratimov.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.