Skip to main content

Security report for vpagro.cz

VP AGRO, spol. s r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VP AGRO, spol. s r.o. is a well-established Czech company founded in 1991, specializing in the distribution of field crop seeds, plant protection chemicals, and fertilizers. The company operates nationwide in the Czech Republic, serving agricultural professionals and farmers. It holds recognized certifications such as ISO 9001, ISO 2001, and GMP B2, underscoring its commitment to quality. The website reflects a professional business with clear contact information, a cookie consent mechanism, and regularly updated content including news and event calendars. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or a published privacy policy, which are areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by external script sources), and implements cookie consent with user choice, but lacks visible security headers and incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust, although the website content and business information appear consistent and professional. Overall, the website is functional, informative, and trustworthy from a business perspective but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy policies, improved security headers, and domain registration clarity to strengthen its security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vpagro.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VP AGRO holds a significant position in the Czech agricultural input distribution market, focusing on seeds, pesticides, and fertilizers. Its business model combines product distribution with agronomic advisory services and event organization, targeting professional users and farmers. The company leverages partnerships with seed producers like RAGT Semences and Betaseed. The presence of certifications and a professional website indicates a mature business with stable revenue streams. The company’s growth is supported by a network of subsidiaries and a nationwide sales force. The lack of WHOIS transparency may be a minor risk but does not detract from the company's operational credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used for external resources, and a cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, security incident contacts, and security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of WHOIS data is a concern for domain trustworthiness but does not directly impact site security. The company should enhance transparency and implement additional security controls to improve compliance and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the website.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options).
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or justified if privacy protected.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VP AGRO, spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VP AGRO, spol. s r.o.
Description
Distributor of field crop seeds, plant protection chemicals, and fertilizers in the Czech Republic. Founded in 1991, holding ISO 9001 certification, and registered distributor of plant protection products for professional users.
Key services
Sale of field crop seeds, Sale of plant protection products, Sale of fertilizers, Agronomic advisory services, Purchase and sale of agricultural commodities, Prognosis of pest occurrence, Organization of seminars and field days
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Bootstrap 4 (bootstrap.min.js, bootstrap.min.css), FontAwesome icons, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Camera slider plugin, Cookie consent panel script
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Material Design fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with user choice
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies
  8. Certifications and business credentials are prominently displayed
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and FontAwesome for icons. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking. The site includes a custom cookie consent panel with granular user options. Performance is moderate with multiple image sliders and animations. Accessibility is basic but functional. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vpagro.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vpagro.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.