Skip to main content

Security report for votehusky.org

the husky party · Government · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website votehusky.org represents a small, informal political party called the Husky Party. The site is designed with a humorous and casual tone, promoting fun and engagement in politics rather than serious political campaigning. The business model is centered on political promotion and community engagement with a niche audience interested in alternative political ideas. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Fonts, hosted under a domain registered via NameCheap with privacy protection. The site lacks advanced frameworks, CMS, or analytics tools, indicating a low digital maturity level. From a security perspective, the website does not demonstrate strong security practices. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no forms to assess input security. The domain uses privacy protection, which is common for small or informal political sites but reduces transparency. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected, but the lack of security best practices and compliance policies is a concern. Overall, the website is safe for general audiences, with no adult or explicit content. However, the lack of privacy compliance, security measures, and professional business information lowers its credibility and trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and professional presentation are recommended to enhance trust and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching votehusky.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
40
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Husky Party operates as a small political entity with a focus on humor and engagement rather than traditional political campaigning. Its market position is niche, targeting voters who appreciate a lighthearted approach to politics. The party's key services include political promotion, policy proposals centered on fun and engagement, and community activities like game nights. The website content suggests no formal election participation or large-scale operations. There are no partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies identified. The business model relies on grassroots support and informal outreach. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of votehusky.org is low. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers exposes the site to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. No privacy or cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The lack of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms further reduces security readiness. While no explicit vulnerabilities or malware were detected, the site would benefit from implementing basic security best practices, including SSL/TLS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures. The informal nature of the site and limited data collection reduce the immediate business impact of these gaps but addressing them is critical for trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including phone numbers and physical addresses if applicable.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
the husky party
Description
A political party website promoting the Husky Party with humorous and informal content focused on fun and engagement in politics.
Key services
Political party promotion, Policy proposals, Community engagement
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a humorous political party site with informal tone.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  4. Only contact email is obfuscated as 'contact (ate) votehusky.org'.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected from data.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. Domain uses privacy protection and is registered via NameCheap.
  9. Site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Fonts.
  10. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack consisting of HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and Google Fonts. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar's DNS servers. Performance is moderate with no indications of optimization or CDN usage. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features detected. SEO optimization is minimal, lacking meta tags beyond the title and charset. The site structure is simple with tab-based navigation implemented via JavaScript. There are no forms or data collection mechanisms, reducing complexity but also limiting engagement capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with votehusky.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review votehusky.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.