Skip to main content

Security report for vortexvision.cz

Josef Šíf · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vortexvision.cz is a professional freelance graphic design studio operated by Josef Šíf, offering a broad range of graphic services including web and e-shop design, photomontages, visualizations, and other graphic works. The business targets clients seeking creative and professional graphic solutions to enhance brand awareness. The website reflects a small-scale operation with 17 years of freelance experience, supported by a portfolio showcasing completed projects. Technically, the site uses a modern but somewhat dated tech stack including Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is moderate; the site uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection but lacks visible security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. The domain registration data is consistent and supports the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of vortexvision.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vortexvision.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small freelance graphic design studio in the Czech Republic, focusing on creative graphic services for web and print. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized service and a broad skill set in graphic design and photomontage. The business model is service-based, targeting small to medium clients needing graphic design solutions. The website demonstrates a stable market presence with a domain age of over 15 years and a portfolio of over 600 designs and 300 photomontages. Partnerships include social media and portfolio platforms such as Facebook, Behance, and MyPortfolio. Growth indicators include a long freelance history and a diverse service offering, though no direct revenue or e-commerce functionality is present on the site.

Security posture

The website shows a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. It uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security robustness. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate but could be improved significantly by implementing recommended security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and ensuring full HTTPS enforcement.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide with strong SSL/TLS settings.
  4. Add terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider updating the technology stack to more current versions (e.g., Bootstrap 5) for better performance and security.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Josef Šíf
Registration number
76025951
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Josef Šíf
Description
Profesionální grafický designer nabízející širokou škálu služeb v oblasti grafiky, včetně designu webů, fotomontáží, vizualizací a dalších grafických služeb. Specializace na tvorbu profesionálních a kreativních grafických řešení pro rozšíření značky a zvýšení povědomí.
Key services
Design webů a eshopů, Fotomontáže a vizualizace, Další grafické služby (webové bannery, návrhy loga, vizitky, tiskoviny)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 3.1.1, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Ubuntu), Font Awesome 5.15.4, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Masonry layout, ImagesLoaded, Fancybox
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small freelance graphic design studio site.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company registration details.
  4. Uses common and modern web technologies but Bootstrap version is older (3.3.7).
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap 3.3.7, and jQuery 3.1.1. It uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icons. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Masonry layout and Fancybox are used for portfolio presentation. The hosting provider is likely Wedos, consistent with the registrar and nameservers. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed metrics but the use of older Bootstrap and jQuery versions suggests some technical debt. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no Open Graph or structured data detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present through semantic HTML and responsive design.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 37/100High37 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vortexvision.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vortexvision.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.