Skip to main content

Security report for voetbalwedden.net

Other · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website voetbalwedden.net is an informational platform focused on football betting, primarily targeting Dutch-speaking users interested in sports betting. The site provides content related to betting strategies, tips, or general information about football betting. The business model appears to be content-driven, possibly monetized through advertising and affiliate marketing, as indicated by the presence of Outbrain and Google Tag Manager scripts. However, the site lacks clear business identity, contact information, and formal policies, which limits its credibility and trustworthiness. From a technical perspective, the website uses modern web fonts and integrates common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Outbrain. The site appears to be mobile-optimized with basic accessibility and SEO features. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks, and performance is moderate. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates a low maturity level in security and compliance. Security posture is weak due to missing security headers, lack of HTTPS verification in the provided data, and absence of privacy and cookie policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable or the domain is unregistered, which raises concerns about the legitimacy and transparency of the domain ownership. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting the ability to report security issues or abuse. Overall, the website presents a basic informational service with limited business credibility and security maturity. Strategic recommendations include establishing clear domain registration and ownership, implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers and HTTPS enforcement, and providing transparent contact and incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching voetbalwedden.net

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a niche market of football betting enthusiasts in the Dutch-speaking region. Its business model likely relies on content monetization through advertising and affiliate marketing, as suggested by the integration of Outbrain and Google Tag Manager. The lack of explicit business information, company registration, or contact details limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The site appears to be a small-scale operation focused on providing betting-related information rather than direct betting services. Growth potential depends on content quality and user engagement, but current content quality is basic. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity of voetbalwedden.net is low. The absence of WHOIS registration data and domain ownership transparency is a significant risk factor. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. The use of third-party scripts introduces potential risks if not properly managed. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to handle security incidents effectively. Overall, the site requires substantial improvements in security and compliance to reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available to improve trust.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify certificate validity.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing information about betting on football (soccer).
Key services
Information about football betting
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Outbrain, Font Awesome 6, Google Fonts (Roboto, Nunito), New Relic monitoring
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Outbrain
Marketing tools
Outbrain
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain is unregistered.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or security policies present.
  5. Website uses common third-party marketing and analytics scripts.
  6. Content is focused on football betting information in Dutch language.
  7. No explicit or adult content detected.
  8. Security posture is weak due to missing headers and policies.
  9. Technical implementation uses modern fonts and tracking but lacks CMS or framework identification.
  10. Overall website quality and professionalism is basic.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including Google Fonts (Roboto, Nunito), Font Awesome 6 icons, and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Outbrain. The site appears to be a static or lightly dynamic content site without a detectable CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility and SEO features are basic. The lack of security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with voetbalwedden.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review voetbalwedden.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.