Skip to main content

Security report for vnda.com.br

Olist Vnda · E-commerce · Brazil

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Olist Vnda is a leading Brazilian omnichannel e-commerce platform designed to empower online retailers with integrated technology and marketing tools to accelerate business growth. The platform offers advanced features such as marketing automation, order management, and direct sales force digitalization, positioning itself strongly in the competitive e-commerce market. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, leveraging Cloudflare for hosting and security. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Mixpanel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Bing UET, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the security posture reveals critical gaps, notably the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which significantly undermine secure communications and user trust. While security headers are well configured, the lack of HTTPS is a major vulnerability. The website demonstrates excellent design, user experience, and content quality, with strong branding and trust signals such as customer case studies and comprehensive privacy policies. Strategic recommendations include immediate SSL/TLS deployment, enabling modern TLS protocols, and implementing cookie consent mechanisms to enhance compliance and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vnda.com.br

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
75
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Olist Vnda operates as a SaaS e-commerce platform under the parent company Olist, targeting online retailers in Brazil seeking omnichannel solutions. The business model focuses on providing a comprehensive technology stack that integrates with over 200 software solutions, including ERPs, payment gateways, and logistics providers. Key competitive advantages include a robust marketing automation suite, advanced promotions capabilities, and a direct sales force digitalization tool. The platform serves enterprise-sized clients and maintains a strong ecosystem with partners like Tiny and Olist Pax. Revenue streams likely derive from subscription plans tailored to different growth stages. The company emphasizes customer success through detailed case studies and a strong support structure. The partnership ecosystem and integration capabilities position Olist Vnda as a strategic player in the Brazilian e-commerce market.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of Olist Vnda's website is moderate but with critical vulnerabilities. The presence of comprehensive security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-XSS-Protection indicates awareness of best practices. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols expose the site to significant risks including data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No evidence of incident response policies or security frameworks like ISO 27001 or NIST was found. Email security is strengthened by valid SPF and DMARC records, reducing phishing risks. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism and explicit data protection officer contact suggests partial GDPR compliance. Overall, the security culture appears to be evolving but requires urgent improvements in encryption and incident response readiness to protect business and customer data effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to enable HTTPS and secure user data in transit.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable legacy protocols to enhance cryptographic security.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update Content Security Policy to minimize use of unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval directives.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is modern, leveraging Next.js and React frameworks for server-side rendering and client interactivity. Hosting and CDN services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring global reach and DDoS protection. The tech stack includes multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Mailchimp, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Bing UET, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing approach. Performance metrics are moderate, with no explicit load time data but optimized resource loading observed. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and canonical URLs. However, the lack of SSL/TLS and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical debt and risk. Modernization efforts should prioritize security upgrades and performance tuning to maintain competitive advantage and operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vnda.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vnda.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.