Skip to main content

Security report for vmb.lt

Vilniaus miesto būstas · Government · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vilniaus miesto būstas is a government-affiliated organization providing housing-related services to residents of Vilnius, Lithuania. The website offers a range of social and municipal housing services including rental compensation, subsidies for home purchase, social housing queue registration, and municipal housing rental and acquisition. The organization positions itself as a partner to Vilnius residents to facilitate home ownership and housing support. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and maintainable digital presence. The site uses HTTPS and integrates external services such as YouTube for media content. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, with basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the website is professionally designed and credible as a government service portal but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security policy transparency, and improved contact information visibility to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vmb.lt

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vilniaus miesto būstas operates within the government sector, focusing on social and municipal housing services in Vilnius. Its business model revolves around public service provision rather than commercial revenue generation. The target audience is local residents seeking housing support. The organization offers multiple housing-related services, indicating a comprehensive approach to municipal housing management. The website content and structured data confirm its role as a trusted government entity. There is no evidence of commercial partnerships or subsidiaries. The digital presence supports public engagement and service delivery but lacks advanced marketing or analytics tools, consistent with a public sector focus.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. There is no visible security contact information such as security@ or abuse@ emails. Privacy compliance is incomplete, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy policies. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy, including dedicated security contact channels.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Improve visibility and availability of official contact information including emails and phone numbers for support and inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vilniaus miesto būstas
Description
Vilniečių partneris, skatinantis turėti namus
Key services
Būsto nuomos kompensacija, Subsidija būstui įsigyti, Įrašymas į socialinio būsto eilę, Socialinio būsto nuoma, Savivaldybės būsto nuoma, Savivaldybės būsto įsigijimas, Nuosavo būsto išnuomojimas, Nuomojamo būsto priežiūra
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, YouTube iframe API
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-related housing service portal for Vilnius city
  2. Content is in Lithuanian language with localized services
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found in the scanned content
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported platform. It integrates jQuery and YouTube iframe API for interactive and media content. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate, with some optimization for mobile devices. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data, enhancing search engine visibility. No hosting provider or CDN information was detected. The site does not appear to use advanced analytics or marketing tools, consistent with a government service portal. Technical debt appears low, but security and privacy implementations require enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vmb.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vmb.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.