Skip to main content

Security report for vltn.be

Tripleclick bvba · Other · Belgium

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at vltn.be appears to be a minimal or underdeveloped site with very limited content and no visible business description or policies. The domain is registered since 2012 with Unix-Solutions BV as the registrar, indicating a mature domain age but no detailed registrant information is available to confirm the business identity. The site uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome Pro icons, but lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications. There are no detected privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor any contact information or forms for user interaction. Security posture is weak with no visible security headers or incident response information. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, and the site is accessible.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vltn.be

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the website is identified as Tripleclick bvba, a small entity likely based in Belgium given the domain and registrar information. However, the website lacks any descriptive content, making it difficult to ascertain market positioning, business model, or key services. There are no visible trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. The absence of contact details and policies suggests the site is either incomplete or not actively maintained for customer engagement or compliance.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is minimal. HTTPS presence and SSL configuration could not be confirmed from the provided data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the site requires significant improvements to meet basic security and privacy standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and ensure strong TLS configuration.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical address.
  4. Introduce security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact channels.
  6. Improve website content quality and navigation to enhance user experience and trust.
  7. Consider adding analytics and consent mechanisms aligned with privacy regulations.
  8. Regularly audit and update website technologies to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tripleclick bvba
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Font Awesome Pro 5.13.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal with no visible business description or policies
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses detected
  4. No forms detected for user interaction or data collection
  5. Uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome Pro for styling and icons
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. No security headers or explicit security measures found in HTML
  8. WHOIS data shows domain registered since 2012 with Unix-Solutions BV registrar
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  10. Website appears incomplete or underdeveloped
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts (Open Sans), and Font Awesome Pro icons. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern JavaScript frameworks. Performance is likely moderate given the limited content and external font loading. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but not fully assessed due to minimal content. SEO optimization is poor as meta tags like title, description, and keywords are empty. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. Hosting provider details are not explicit beyond registrar information. Overall, the technical infrastructure is simple and requires enhancements for modern web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vltn.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vltn.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.