Skip to main content

Security report for vlibras.gov.br

Governo Digital · Government · Brazil

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents an official Brazilian government digital service focused on accessibility for deaf users through the VLibras suite, which provides automatic translation of digital content into Brazilian Sign Language. It is a collaborative initiative involving multiple government ministries and a federal university, positioning it as a key accessibility tool within the government digital ecosystem. The site is hosted on a government domain with appropriate technical infrastructure and uses modern web technologies including Plone CMS, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager. The design and content quality are good, with clear navigation and accessibility considerations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or cookie policies. No contact information or incident response details are provided on the analyzed page, which limits transparency in these areas. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, serving a critical public service function.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of vlibras.gov.br. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain:

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vlibras.gov.br

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The VLibras project is positioned as a government essential service targeting accessibility for the deaf community in Brazil. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on public service and digital inclusion. The partnership ecosystem includes the Ministry of Management and Innovation in Public Services, the Ministry of Human Rights and Citizenship, and the Federal University of Paraíba, indicating strong institutional support. The site supports government digital transformation and accessibility mandates, enhancing the inclusivity of public digital services. Market positioning is strong within the government sector, with no direct commercial competitors. The project benefits from official branding and trust signals, but could improve user engagement by providing clearer contact and policy information.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a government informational site but with room for improvement in policy publication and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Implement and configure standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy) to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details to improve transparency.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Governo Digital
Description
VLibras is a suite of free and open-source tools that automatically translate digital content (text, audio, and video) in Portuguese to Brazilian Sign Language (Libras), making computers, mobile devices, and web platforms more accessible to deaf people. It is a partnership between the Ministry of Management and Innovation in Public Services (MGISP), through the Secretariat of Digital Government (SGD), the Ministry of Human Rights and Citizenship (MDHC), through the National Secretariat for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (SNDPD), and the Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), via the Laboratory of Digital Video Applications (LAVID).
Key services
Automatic translation of digital content to Brazilian Sign Language, Accessibility tools for web and multimedia content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Plone CMS, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Swiper.js, GovBR custom scripts and styles, JSON-LD structured data
Frameworks
Plone
Platforms
GovBR Portal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by gov.br domain and no indication of HTTP)
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official Brazilian government digital accessibility service
  2. Focus on accessibility for deaf users via VLibras suite
  3. Good use of structured data and semantic markup
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the page
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on this page
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  7. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML content
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  9. Social media presence on Instagram and Twitter
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Plone CMS platform, leveraging jQuery and other JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Font Awesome for UI components. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The hosting appears to be managed by SERPRO, a Brazilian government IT service provider, as indicated by the nameservers. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features consistent with its mission. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances SEO and semantic clarity. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security header implementation and policy publication are recommended to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vlibras.gov.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vlibras.gov.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.