Skip to main content

Security report for vivar.lv

Vivar Serviss, SIA · Other · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vivar Serviss, SIA is a Latvian-based professional cleaning service company operating since 2011. The company offers a broad range of cleaning services including office cleaning, residential cleaning, window and facade washing, carpet cleaning, upholstery cleaning, and floor waxing. Their market position is that of a trusted local service provider with a focus on quality and long-term client relationships. The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, but privacy and cookie policies are not clearly presented, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and visible incident response information. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, serving a general audience seeking cleaning services in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vivar.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets both private individuals and businesses in Latvia, emphasizing quality and reliability. Their business model is direct service provision with a focus on customer satisfaction and repeat business. The presence of customer logos and detailed service descriptions supports their credibility. The company appears small-sized but established, with no parent or subsidiary companies indicated. Marketing tools include Google Tag Manager and MonsterInsights, supporting moderate user tracking. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement in compliance. The company’s partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram, enhancing customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy reduces the ability for external parties to report security issues responsibly. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML source. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Add visible incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Vivar Serviss, SIA
VAT number
LV40103460942
Registration number
40103460942
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vivar Serviss, SIA
Description
Mūsu tīrīšanas un uzkopšanas serviss pielieto jaunākās tīrīšanas tehnoloģijas un izmanto modernu profesionālo aprīkojumu. Piedāvā profesionālus uzkopšanas un tīrīšanas pakalpojumus gan juridiskām, gan privātpersonām, tostarp biroju, māju, logu, paklāju un mēbeļu tīrīšanu.
Key services
Logu un fasādes mazgāšana, Ģenerālā tīrīšana, Biroju telpu uzkopšana, Paklāju ķīmiskā tīrīšana, Māju un dzīvokļu tīrīšana, Mīksto mēbeļu tīrīšana, Grīdas vaskošana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Analytics, Font Awesome, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional cleaning service based in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English metadata.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found on the homepage or footer.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Good SEO metadata and structured data present.
  10. No visible incident response or security policy pages.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins for page building and sliders, indicating a standard but effective technical infrastructure. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The use of Google Fonts and Font Awesome enhances design consistency. However, no advanced hosting or CDN information was detected. Accessibility features are basic, suggesting potential for improvement. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vivar.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vivar.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.