Skip to main content

Security report for viva.cz

Kovárna VIVA · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kovárna VIVA is a modern forging company based in the Czech Republic specializing in high-quality forged steel components for leading industrial and automotive clients such as Bosch, Scania, ZF, and Linde. The company operates as a B2B manufacturer with a strong market position in Central Europe, supported by its parent company Moravia Steel. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting industrial manufacturers and engineering firms. Technically, the site employs modern tracking and marketing technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Adform, alongside a cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and bot protection via reCAPTCHA, though it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and adding a vulnerability disclosure policy to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching viva.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention viva.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for viva.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company serves high-demand sectors such as automotive and heavy machinery manufacturing, offering custom forging solutions and precision components. Its client base includes globally recognized brands, indicating strong competitive advantages in quality and innovation. The business model focuses on manufacturing excellence and customer-specific solutions, supported by a medium-sized workforce and modern facilities. The partnership with Moravia Steel provides additional market leverage. The website content and testimonials suggest a stable and experienced workforce, contributing to operational reliability. Marketing efforts leverage multiple ad networks and retargeting services to maintain visibility and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent with granular categories, and bot mitigation via Google reCAPTCHA. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools increases the attack surface but appears managed with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with enhanced headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kovárna VIVA
Description
Kovárna VIVA se specializuje na zápustkové kování z nejkvalitnější oceli a nabízí unikátní řešení a prvotřídní kvalitu pro špičky světového průmyslu.
Key services
Design and manufacture of forged steel parts, Custom forging solutions, High precision components for automotive and industrial sectors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Maps API, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Adform tracking, Seznam retargeting, CookieConsent.js, jQuery (implied by vendor.js), Custom JavaScript and CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords, Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Seznam retargeting
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms in place.
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  4. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  6. Good branding and consistent professional presentation.
  7. Contact information clearly provided with company domain email and phone.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google APIs, reCAPTCHA, and multiple marketing/tracking scripts. It is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and accessibility features. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident. The site includes multimedia content such as videos and image carousels, enhancing user engagement. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce potential vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with viva.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review viva.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.