Skip to main content

Security report for visual.ws

Pexxi:solutions · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pexxi:solutions is a Slovak technology company specializing in custom software solutions, particularly for e-commerce platforms and web presentations. With a claimed 16 years of experience, they provide integrations, extensions, and web development services targeting businesses seeking tailored technology solutions. The website is professionally designed using Webflow CMS and includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism in Slovak, reflecting GDPR compliance. Technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Fonts, Facebook SDK, and Google Analytics, hosted on Webflow's platform with HTTPS enabled and good SSL configuration. Security posture is solid with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, though security headers and incident response policies are absent. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed queries, limiting domain registration transparency and slightly reducing trust. Overall, the website is accessible, well-structured, and business-focused, with clear contact channels and partner references.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching visual.ws

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on B2B services for e-commerce and web integrations. Their business model centers on custom software development and platform extensions, serving clients across various industries. The website showcases numerous client projects and integrations with popular platforms like Magento, Shopify, Drupal, and WordPress, indicating a strong niche expertise. Partnerships with payment gateways and affiliate programs enhance their service offerings. The presence of multiple external client domains suggests an active and diverse customer base. Market positioning appears as a specialized small business with consistent branding and a professional online presence. Growth potential is supported by ongoing updates and a broad portfolio of solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent mechanism supporting user privacy choices. No security headers were detected, which is a recommended improvement to enhance protection against common web attacks. The absence of published security policies or incident response plans indicates room for maturity in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook SDK is balanced with privacy compliance efforts. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pexxi:solutions
Description
Pexxi:solutions provides technology solutions with 16 years of experience, offering custom software integrations, e-commerce extensions, and web presentations for clients.
Key services
Custom e-commerce integrations, Web presentations, Software extensions, Payment gateway integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Google Fonts, Facebook SDK, Google Analytics, CookieConsent plugin
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-focused, targeting technology and e-commerce clients.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed user controls in Slovak language.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed query; no registrant info found.
  5. Multiple external links to client and partner domains indicate active business relationships.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Contact information includes email via form, phone link, and social media Facebook page.
  9. Website uses modern Webflow CMS and common web technologies.
  10. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. It integrates Facebook SDK for social features and Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is hosted on Webflow's infrastructure with HTTPS and SSL properly configured, ensuring secure data transmission. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The cookie consent plugin is well integrated, supporting GDPR compliance. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. No broken elements or errors were detected. Technical debt appears low, but security headers and formal policies are missing, representing modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with visual.ws. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visual.ws.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.