Skip to main content

Security report for visier.com

Visier · Technology · Canada

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Visier is an enterprise SaaS company specializing in people analytics and workforce planning software. Their platform enables business professionals and HR leaders to leverage data-driven insights to improve workforce outcomes and business results. Positioned as a leading people analytics provider, Visier targets medium to large enterprises with a focus on technology-driven HR solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional branding and comprehensive service descriptions. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as React and Gatsby, with integration of Okta for secure authentication. The site demonstrates fast performance, good mobile optimization, and adherence to SEO and accessibility best practices. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Tag Manager, supporting moderate user tracking with privacy compliance. From a security perspective, Visier employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and security headers. The use of Okta indicates a robust authentication mechanism. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response page and lack of a vulnerability disclosure mechanism are areas for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for enterprise SaaS companies but slightly reduces transparency. Overall, Visier presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, adding a vulnerability disclosure page, and enhancing transparency around domain registration to further build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching visier.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention visier.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
28
Employees
7
Customers
19
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-05-29 · 9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for visier.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –my.visier.com2026-05-29
  • –my.visier.com2026-04-30
  • –auth.visier.com2026-01-10
  • –my.visier.com2026-01-10
  • –drive.visier.com2026-01-10

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Visier operates in the technology sector, focusing on HR analytics and workforce planning SaaS solutions. Their market positioning as a leader in people analytics is supported by certifications such as SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, which enhance trust among enterprise clients. The business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting HR professionals and business leaders seeking data-driven workforce insights. The company has a strong partnership ecosystem, including integrations with identity providers like Okta. Growth indicators include a comprehensive digital presence and active social media engagement. The company’s operations appear well-structured with clear service offerings and professional branding.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and secure authentication via Okta. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a publicly accessible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program indicates gaps in transparency and readiness communication. GDPR compliance is supported by comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators could be improved by publishing dedicated resources. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced with better communication and disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information and procedures on the website.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency around domain registration and ownership information.
  5. Continue to monitor and update privacy compliance measures in line with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Visier Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Visier
Description
People analytics for business people. Achieve better people and business results with the leading people analytics platform.
Key services
People analytics, Workforce planning, Data-driven HR insights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Okta (authentication), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Gatsby
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Use of Okta for authentication
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry data unavailability.
  4. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are present.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  6. Use of modern technologies and frameworks (React, Gatsby, Okta).
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Contact information is available via contact page and footer.
  10. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Gatsby, enabling fast static site generation and good performance. Integration with Okta provides secure authentication capabilities. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. The design is responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. No technical debt or legacy technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site performance and security headers suggest a professional hosting environment. Opportunities exist to further improve technical transparency by disclosing hosting and CDN providers and implementing advanced security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with visier.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visier.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.