广州唯品会电子商务有限公司 · E-commerce · China
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.
The website www.vip.com represents a major Chinese e-commerce platform specializing in flash sales of branded products at discounted prices. It targets Chinese consumers seeking authentic branded merchandise with assurances of quality and low prices. The platform offers a wide range of categories including apparel, cosmetics, home goods, and luxury items, supported by a membership club and customer service infrastructure. The website is well-branded, professionally designed, and optimized for both desktop and mobile users, with clear navigation and SEO metadata in Chinese. Technically, the site uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and JavaScript, served over HTTPS with enforced redirection from HTTP. While the site lacks some modern security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms, it employs CAPTCHA for certain features and maintains good security hygiene with no exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data suggests domain privacy protection, which is common for large commercial entities. The site displays multiple official Chinese business licenses and certifications, reinforcing its legitimacy. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a solid posture with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities in the provided content. However, improvements could be made by implementing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and adding cookie consent to enhance privacy compliance. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content detected. Strategically, the platform should focus on enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to maintain customer trust and meet evolving regulatory requirements. Technical modernization and accessibility improvements would further strengthen user experience and operational resilience.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention vip.com, from OffSeq Breach.
160 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for vip.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with vip.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vip.com.