Skip to main content

Security report for vinarstvientree.cz

Vinařství Entrée · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vinařství Entrée is a small family-owned boutique winery established in 2017 in Mikulov, Czech Republic. The winery focuses on producing exceptional wines from the Mikulov region, emphasizing quality and the natural aging process. The business model centers on limited production batches and direct sales primarily to private clients through personal tastings and an external e-shop. The website reflects a professional but modest digital presence built on WordPress, with clear branding and contact information. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Technically, the site uses standard WordPress themes and jQuery, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy for its niche but could improve compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vinarstvientree.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The winery operates in the niche boutique wine sector, targeting wine enthusiasts and private clients who value quality and personalized service. Its competitive advantage lies in its family heritage, limited production, and location in the renowned Mikulov wine region. Revenue streams likely include direct sales, tastings, and online orders via a partner e-shop. The company maintains a focused brand identity with consistent messaging and social media presence on Facebook and Instagram. Growth potential may be limited by production scale but enhanced by strong customer relationships and regional reputation. No evidence of partnerships beyond the e-shop domain was found.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response information is provided, indicating limited readiness for vulnerability disclosures or security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring improvements to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vinařství Entrée
Description
Malé rodinné butikové vinařství založené v roce 2017 v Mikulově, zaměřené na výrobu výjimečných vín z Mikulovska s důrazem na kvalitu a čas potřebný pro víno. Vinařství je rodinný podnik manželů Tréškovi a jejich syna Jakuba, s výrobou v historickém sklepě pod Svatým kopečkem.
Key services
Výroba bílých a červených vín, Degustace a přímý prodej, E-shop (externí)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, PHP
Frameworks
Twenty Seventeen WordPress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a small family winery focused on quality wine production.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which limits domain trust verification.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. No security.txt or incident response info present.
  5. Website uses WordPress with standard theme and jQuery.
  6. Contact info is clearly provided with emails and phone numbers.
  7. No signs of adult explicit content but alcohol-related content is present.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Site is accessible without WAF or blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Twenty Seventeen theme and jQuery library. It employs standard web technologies with no advanced frameworks detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is minimally addressed with meta tags and canonical links but lacks structured data like JSON-LD for enhanced search presence. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site does not use analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user data collection. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in security and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vinarstvientree.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vinarstvientree.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.