Skip to main content

Security report for vifdays.info

Vienna Interior Fashion Days · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vienna Interior Fashion Days is a niche event organizer focused on showcasing interior fashion brands in Vienna, Austria. The website promotes an upcoming event scheduled for February 2026, featuring seven showrooms of notable brands in fabrics, wallpapers, and sun protection. The business targets interior design professionals and industry participants, positioning itself as a specialized event within the interior fashion sector. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and employs modern web technologies, including a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations. Security measures include HTTPS and the Wordfence plugin, though some security headers are not explicitly detected. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and compliant with GDPR requirements, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vifdays.info

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vifdays.info, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for vifdays.info right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the event organization sector, specifically targeting the interior fashion industry. Its business model revolves around hosting and promoting industry events that facilitate brand exposure and networking. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, indicating a focused market presence. The lack of detailed WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, common for small or event-based businesses. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The business appears small in size with a localized market focus in Vienna. Contact information is limited to an email address, with no phone numbers or physical addresses clearly provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of Wordfence security plugin. A comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS were detected in the HTML content. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of a security.txt or incident response contact information limits transparency in vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. Regular updates and security audits are recommended to maintain and improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response information.
  3. Enhance contact information by adding verified company phone numbers and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate security gaps.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vienna Interior Fashion Days
Description
Event showcasing seven showrooms of renowned brands in fabrics, wallpapers, sun protection, and interior fashion, scheduled for 26-27 February 2026.
Key services
Event hosting, Brand showroom presentations, Industry networking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Real Cookie Banner Pro, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of Wordfence security plugin

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on an interior fashion event in Vienna.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
  6. No contact phone numbers found; only one base64 encoded email contact found.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  8. Website uses modern WordPress technologies and cookie consent management.
  9. No advertising or tracking services detected beyond Google Fonts.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and uses Real Cookie Banner Pro for cookie consent management. External resources include Google Fonts and Typekit for typography. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with some preloading of scripts and styles. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site uses modern JavaScript and CSS libraries but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional event website with room for improvement in security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vifdays.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vifdays.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.