Skip to main content

Security report for vieser.fi

Vieser Oy · Manufacturing · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vieser Oy is a Finnish manufacturing company specializing in floor drains, with a market presence dating back to 1973. The company targets construction professionals and consumers primarily in Finland and the Nordic region. Their website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress and WooCommerce, supporting e-commerce and multilingual content. The technical infrastructure is modern and includes standard industry tools such as Google Analytics and Cookie Information for privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers, though there is room for improvement in CSP implementation and incident response transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, supporting the company's established market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vieser.fi

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vieser Oy operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on floor drains and related products. The company leverages a direct sales model via its website and maintains a consistent brand presence across multiple Nordic countries. Their digital ecosystem includes social media engagement and analytics tools to optimize marketing and customer insights. The business benefits from a long domain age and consistent WHOIS data, reinforcing legitimacy. However, the absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers on the site suggests reliance on contact forms and indirect communication channels. The company appears well-positioned in its niche with opportunities to enhance customer trust through more visible contact and security disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS, standard security headers, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the lack of a security.txt file, incident response information, and detailed security policies limits transparency for security researchers and customers. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and SiteGainer is managed with consent but should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Enhancing CSP headers and publishing security policies would strengthen the security posture and compliance maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a full Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate XSS risks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  3. Add explicit contact emails and phone numbers to facilitate direct communication.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities and update accordingly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Serres Oy
Registration number
0591721-3
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vieser Oy
Description
Me Vieserillä uskomme, että kaiken voi tehdä aina vähän paremmin. ✓ Vieser-lattiakaivot jo vuodesta 1973. → Tutustu koko valikoimaan
Key services
Manufacture and sale of floor drains (lattiakaivot)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Information consent tool
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, SiteGainer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
SiteGainer
Marketing tools
Cookie Information
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML, but contact form and physical address implied
  4. Use of modern CMS and e-commerce platform (WooCommerce) with standard plugins
  5. Social media presence across multiple platforms consistent with brand
  6. No visible security or privacy policy pages on main site, but privacy policy linked via cookie consent tool
  7. No terms of service or incident response information found
  8. Good SEO and metadata usage including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, using Bootstrap 5 and jQuery for frontend responsiveness and interactivity. Google Tag Manager and Cookie Information scripts are integrated for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with caching and minification evident. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers for a more robust technical foundation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vieser.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vieser.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.