Skip to main content

Security report for vidia-design.cz

VIDIA-DESIGN s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VIDIA-DESIGN s.r.o. is a Czech Republic based small business specializing in online marketing, creative design, and internet advertising services. The company emphasizes effective marketing solutions including logo creation, web development, and SEO optimization, targeting businesses seeking to enhance their online presence. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content showcasing their expertise and client projects. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are good, though some technical modernization could be beneficial. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed), no security headers were detected, and no incident response or security policies are published. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency, impacting overall trust. Privacy compliance is good with a clear cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and clearer business contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vidia-design.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an experienced provider of online marketing and creative design services with 24 years in the market, targeting primarily Czech businesses. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on digital marketing solutions and web development. The website content and project showcases suggest a client-focused approach with a moderate market presence. The lack of explicit contact details and WHOIS transparency may limit trust from new clients. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The company leverages standard marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and cookie consent scripts, indicating awareness of digital marketing and privacy regulations. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed. Strategic observations include the need for improved domain registration transparency and enhanced security disclosures to strengthen market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with implementation of cookie consent and use of HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly verified). However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no contact channels for security incidents are provided. The WHOIS data absence is a significant concern, as it impedes verification of domain ownership and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the cookie banner and privacy policy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in transparency, header implementation, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information or ensure transparency to improve trustworthiness.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers on the website.
  4. Publish security policy and incident response procedures with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Modernize technology stack by upgrading Bootstrap and auditing third-party scripts for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VIDIA-DESIGN s.r.o.
Description
Efektivní online marketing od tvorby loga, přes web až po optimalizaci pro vyhledávače.
Key services
online marketing, creative design, internet advertising, logo creation, web development, SEO optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Fonts (Raleway, Lato), Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with a detailed banner and user controls.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage HTML.
  5. No privacy or security policy pages explicitly linked except cookie policy and privacy policy.
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  7. Website uses standard modern web technologies but Bootstrap version is somewhat outdated (3.3.7).
  8. No social media links found in the provided HTML content.
  9. No security headers detected in the HTML content; SSL status unknown.
  10. Website content is business-focused, targeting clients for marketing and design services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and a cookie consent script, indicating a standard but somewhat dated technology stack. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. No broken links or errors were found in the HTML content. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit SSL configuration details. Technical debt is moderate due to older Bootstrap version and missing security best practices. Opportunities exist to upgrade frameworks, improve security headers, and enhance accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vidia-design.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vidia-design.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.