Skip to main content

Security report for viclarity.com

ViClarity · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ViClarity is a global technology and consulting firm specializing in governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) solutions tailored for regulated industries. The company maintains a professional online presence with regional focus areas including the United States, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Their website provides clear business information, multiple contact points, and privacy policies aligned with GDPR requirements, reflecting a commitment to compliance and customer trust. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Analytics and tracking are implemented responsibly with user consent mechanisms in place. From a security perspective, the site does not expose sensitive data and employs cookie consent best practices. However, explicit security headers and incident response policies are not publicly visible, suggesting room for improvement in security transparency and hardening. The domain uses privacy protection in WHOIS, which is typical and justified for this business type, with no suspicious discrepancies detected. Overall, ViClarity's website reflects a solid business and technical foundation with good privacy compliance and moderate security posture. Strategic enhancements in security policies, accessibility, and explicit incident response disclosures would further strengthen their digital trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching viclarity.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ViClarity operates in the technology sector, focusing on GRC solutions for regulated industries, positioning itself as a global provider with localized services. Their business model combines technology products with consulting services, targeting organizations needing compliance and risk management. The presence of multiple regional addresses and phone numbers indicates a geographically diverse customer base. The company leverages trusted third-party tools for analytics and privacy management, indicating a mature approach to digital marketing and compliance. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed on the site, suggesting a focused operational structure. The lack of terms of service and explicit security policies may impact customer confidence in certain markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with implementation of cookie consent and privacy policies compliant with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, the absence of visible security headers and incident response contact information indicates gaps in security transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS is standard for this business type but limits direct verification of registrant details. Overall, the security posture is adequate but would benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance and user experience.
  5. Publish terms of service to improve legal clarity and customer trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ViClarity
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ViClarity
Description
ViClarity is a global provider of governance, risk and compliance technology and consulting solutions for a variety of regulated industries.
Key services
Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) technology solutions, Consulting services for regulated industries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.3, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
Blue Compass Interactive custom scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses ASP.NET with __VIEWSTATE indicating server-side state management
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with OneTrust, including granular categories
  3. Multiple contact phone numbers and addresses provided in structured data
  4. No explicit terms of service found on homepage or linked pages
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  6. Social media links commented out or not present in main navigation
  7. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenge
  8. Use of Google Fonts and asynchronous loading for performance
  9. LinkedIn Insight and Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET technology with client-side enhancements using jQuery and asynchronous script loading for performance optimization. Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight tags are used for analytics and marketing tracking, integrated with OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site uses Google Fonts with preconnect and preload optimizations. The presence of __VIEWSTATE hidden fields confirms server-side state management typical of ASP.NET. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness, though no explicit hosting provider or CDN details are evident. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format, enhancing search engine visibility. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO, accessibility, and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with viclarity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review viclarity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.