Skip to main content

Security report for vicenez.com

Více než agentura, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Více než agentura, s.r.o. is a Czech Republic based small marketing agency specializing in online marketing, web development, consulting, and education services. The company positions itself as more than a typical agency, emphasizing professional expertise and comprehensive digital marketing solutions. Their website is built on WordPress using Elementor and related plugins, reflecting a modern and professional digital presence. The site includes GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies with a consent mechanism, indicating attention to privacy regulations. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the website is well-structured, user-friendly, and trustworthy, targeting businesses and professionals in the Czech market seeking marketing and web services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vicenez.com

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
85
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on digital marketing and web services. Their business model revolves around providing consulting, audits, web development, social media strategy, and training. The target audience includes small to medium businesses and professionals in need of online marketing expertise. The firm appears to be independent with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a credible market position. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools suggests a data-driven approach to client services. No direct revenue streams or payment processing partners were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented to comply with GDPR. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. There is no public security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program visible, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small marketing agency but could benefit from formalized security documentation and enhanced HTTP headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training for staff to foster a security-aware culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Více než agentura, s.r.o.
Description
Postaráme se o sociální sítě, postavíme funkční web, nastavíme kampaně a posbíráme data. A to vše více než dobře.
Key services
Online marketing, Web development and optimization, Consultations and audits, Social media strategy, Education and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor, Elementor Pro, Essential Addons for Elementor, Complianz GDPR plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Matomo
Marketing tools
Elementor Pro marketing widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in Czech language targeting Czech market
  3. Professional marketing agency with focus on online marketing, web development, and consulting
  4. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder and GDPR compliance plugins
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible
  6. No exposed emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  7. Contact is primarily via contact form on dedicated contact page
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. No certifications or trust badges explicitly displayed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with Elementor and several plugins including Essential Addons and Complianz GDPR. It uses Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Matomo for analytics and tracking, integrated with a cookie consent banner. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with good SEO meta tags and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible. No hosting provider details were found. The technical stack is modern and suitable for a small digital agency, but security headers and accessibility could be improved. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses standard web technologies and libraries.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vicenez.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vicenez.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.