Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg Senatskanzlei · Government · Germany
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.
The website www.verstoss-geldwaeschegesetz.de is an official German government service provided by the Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg Senatskanzlei, supported by the federal government. It offers an online platform for citizens and authorities to report suspected violations of the money laundering law anonymously and securely. The service aims to protect the informant's identity while facilitating compliance and enforcement efforts against money laundering activities. The site is clearly targeted at German residents and government entities involved in compliance and law enforcement. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries including Shaka Player and ContentFlow SDK, and uses eTracker for analytics with cookie blocking enabled to respect privacy. The site is hosted on PlusServer infrastructure, indicating reliable hosting. The design is professional, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with clear navigation and relevant content. However, no explicit cookie consent mechanism was found, and security headers are not visibly configured in the HTML. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML. No forms are present in the provided HTML, suggesting data collection is handled via external portals or other mechanisms. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response contacts indicates room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and transparency. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the website's government affiliation, with nameservers pointing to a reputable hosting provider. No suspicious patterns or privacy protection are present, supporting the legitimacy of the domain. The site does not contain any adult or questionable content and is safe for general audiences. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding a cookie consent mechanism, publishing a security.txt file, and providing incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance. Regular audits of third-party scripts and ongoing security assessments are also advised.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention verstoss-geldwaeschegesetz.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for verstoss-geldwaeschegesetz.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with verstoss-geldwaeschegesetz.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review verstoss-geldwaeschegesetz.de.