Skip to main content

Security report for version1.com

Version 1 · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Version 1 is a large, established technology consulting and managed services provider focused on digital transformation, cloud, AI, and business transformation frameworks. The company positions itself as a strategic partner for businesses seeking to modernize applications, optimize cloud infrastructure, and leverage AI-driven insights. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, strong SEO, and professional design. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern fonts, SVG icons, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness, suitable for its target audience of enterprise clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching version1.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention version1.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
481
Employees
10
Customers
417
Third parties
54
Weak passwords
73%

Latest record dated 2026-05-17 · 5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for version1.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.version1.com2026-05-17
  • –iris.version1.com2026-05-15
  • –sts.version1.com2026-01-29
  • –sts.version1.com2025-11-01
  • –sts.version1.com2025-08-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Version 1 operates in multiple sectors including Financial Services, Public Sector, Energy, Healthcare, Transport, and Manufacturing. Their business model centers on delivering technology transformation services, managed services, and AI-driven solutions. The company leverages partnerships and showcases customer success stories to build credibility. Their global footprint and comprehensive service offerings indicate a strong market position. The website content and structure support a customer-centric approach with clear calls to action and detailed service descriptions. Social media presence across major platforms enhances brand visibility and engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, uses secure forms without exposed sensitive data, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and does not provide a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure page. No dedicated incident response contact channels were found. The absence of these elements suggests room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were detected in the HTML content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit contact channels for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Version 1
Description
We don’t just deliver transformation, we empower you to define the future. Our global footprint and mindset accelerates your business at a pace that matches your ambition. This lets you focus on what matters most – discovering new opportunities and avenues for growth.
Key services
Application Modernisation and Integration, ASPIRE Managed Services, Cloud Transformation, Data x AI, Enterprise Applications, Experience Design and Development, Evolve – Business Transformation Framework, Software Asset Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, WordPress, woff2 fonts, SVG icons
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is comprehensive and business-focused
  3. Strong SEO and social media integration
  4. No visible security or privacy red flags
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for search optimization and Google Tag Manager for analytics. It uses modern web fonts (woff2), SVG icons, and responsive design techniques ensuring excellent mobile optimization and accessibility. Performance appears fast with preloading of fonts and asynchronous script loading. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation menus and semantic HTML elements. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable technologies in the provided HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with version1.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review version1.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.