Skip to main content

Security report for verkter.com

Other · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.verkter.com appears to be an e-commerce or product listing platform built using Magento PWA Studio (Venia). It integrates multiple third-party advertising and analytics services such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Klaviyo, and various ad networks including DoubleClick and Casale Media. The site implements a cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categorization, indicating some level of privacy compliance effort. However, no privacy policy, terms of service, or contact information is readily found on the site, which limits transparency and user trust. The WHOIS lookup failed to retrieve any domain registration data, raising concerns about the domain's legitimacy or recent registration status. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized, but security headers are minimal and weakly configured, with a permissive Content-Security-Policy that could expose the site to risks. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, but the lack of WHOIS data and privacy/legal disclosures reduces its trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching verkter.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind www.verkter.com is not clearly identified on the website. The absence of contact details, company name, or legal information suggests a low level of business transparency. The site targets general consumers likely interested in e-commerce products, leveraging advertising and tracking extensively for marketing and analytics. The business model appears to rely on product sales or affiliate marketing, supported by multiple ad networks and tracking tools. The lack of privacy and terms documentation may expose the business to compliance risks, especially under GDPR or similar regulations. The domain's unregistered or hidden WHOIS status is unusual for a commercial site and warrants further investigation. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the site content or linked domains.

Security posture

Security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS is enabled, and cookie consent is implemented, which are positive indicators. However, the Content-Security-Policy header is set to allow all sources (default-src *), which is a weak configuration that can allow cross-site scripting or data injection attacks. Other common security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security are not detected. The site uses multiple third-party scripts, increasing the attack surface. No explicit incident response or security policy information is found. The absence of WHOIS data and lack of transparency further reduce trust. Recommendations include strengthening security headers, auditing third-party scripts, and publishing security and privacy policies.

Recommendations

  1. Strengthen Content-Security-Policy header to restrict allowed sources and reduce XSS risks.
  2. Add additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information and business identity details on the website.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookie-Script, Bootstrap CSS
Frameworks
Venia (Magento PWA Studio)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Klaviyo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick, Casale Media, Smart AdServer, Meta (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Klaviyo, YouTube, Twitter
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, Cookie-Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses multiple third-party advertising and tracking services.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categorization.
  3. No visible contact information or business identity details on the site.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, domain registration status unclear.
  5. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  6. Security headers are minimal and weakly configured.
  7. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  8. Website appears to be an e-commerce or product listing platform using Magento PWA Studio (Venia).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern PWA framework (Magento Venia) and uses Bootstrap CSS for styling. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and tracking. Cookie-Script is used for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized and has a good user experience with clear navigation. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking issues. However, the security configuration is weak with minimal headers and a permissive Content-Security-Policy. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly found. The site uses multiple external domains for advertising and tracking, which should be monitored for privacy and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with verkter.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review verkter.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.