Zweckverband eGo-Saar · Government · Germany
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.
The website vergabe.saarland serves as the official electronic procurement platform for the Saarland region in Germany, operated by Zweckverband eGo-Saar. It provides public sector entities such as cities, municipalities, and state administration with a centralized platform to publish tenders and manage electronic submissions. The platform targets businesses and contractors interested in public procurement within Saarland, offering services like digital download of tender documents and electronic bid submission. The site is well-branded with official logos and maintains a professional appearance consistent with government standards. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with common web technologies such as jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. Hosting is provided by plusserver.com, and the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Cookie consent is implemented with an opt-in mechanism for Google Analytics and Facebook Ads, reflecting a good level of privacy compliance. However, some security headers are missing or misconfigured, such as an empty Content-Security-Policy and lack of DNSSEC, which slightly reduce the security posture. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited status on the domain to prevent unauthorized transfers. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's governmental purpose, showing consistent registration details. No signs of malware, phishing, or suspicious activity were detected. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicate GDPR compliance, but no explicit security policy or incident response information is published. Overall, vergabe.saarland is a legitimate, regionally focused government procurement platform with good content quality and business credibility. Security practices are adequate but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC, configuring security headers properly, and publishing security policies. The site is safe for general audiences and does not contain any adult or questionable content.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention vergabe.saarland, from OffSeq Breach.
1 subdomain affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for vergabe.saarland.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with vergabe.saarland. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vergabe.saarland.