Skip to main content

Security report for verejnazaloba.cz

Soustava státního zastupitelství ČR · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Soustava státního zastupitelství' serves as the official web portal for the public prosecution system of the Czech Republic. It provides comprehensive information about the structure, activities, and regional offices of the state prosecution service. The site targets citizens, legal professionals, and government entities, offering transparency and public service information. The business model is that of a government-operated informational portal, with a medium organizational size and a founding date consistent with the domain registration in 2020. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Smart Slider 3 for content management and presentation. It employs modern web technologies including jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for traffic analysis, with consent mechanisms set to deny data storage by default. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring secure communication, and demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks explicit security headers and does not provide visible privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information is present, indicating areas for improvement in security transparency and user trust. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its government function. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact details, slightly reduces its compliance and user assurance scores. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen its security posture and privacy compliance, further solidifying its role as a reliable public service portal.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching verejnazaloba.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal occupies a key position as the official digital presence of the Czech Republic's public prosecution system, providing authoritative information and resources. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status and comprehensive coverage of regional prosecution offices. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service and legal transparency. Revenue streams are not applicable. The target customer segments include the general public, legal professionals, and government agencies. Growth indicators include regular updates and integration of interactive features such as maps. Partnerships with justice.cz and the Union of State Prosecutors of the Czech Republic are evident, enhancing its ecosystem. The site reflects a stable operational model consistent with government digital services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and denial of tracking consent by default. Key vulnerabilities include the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published privacy and cookie policies, which are essential for GDPR and NIS2 compliance. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, limiting transparency and responsiveness to security incidents. Data protection practices are implied but not explicitly documented. The security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and user communication. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop a long-term security strategy including user education, regular updates, and compliance monitoring to maintain trust and legal adherence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Soustava státního zastupitelství ČR
Description
Webový portál soustavy státního zastupitelství ČR, který poskytuje informace o státním zastupitelství, dohledu nad zákonností přípravného řízení trestního, zastupování veřejné žaloby před soudem a ochraně veřejného zájmu v dalších řízeních.
Key services
Informace o státním zastupitelství, Přehled státních zastupitelství a zástupců, Zprávy o činnosti státního zastupitelství, Mapa soustavy státního zastupitelství
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Smart Slider 3, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Consent Mode with denied default for ad_storage, analytics_storage, personalization_storage

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official government website for Czech Republic's public prosecution system
  2. Content is in Czech with English language option
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in provided content
  4. Use of modern WordPress CMS with common plugins
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML
  6. No social media links detected
  7. Site uses HTTPS and Google Analytics with consent denied by default
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  9. Site includes an interactive map of regional prosecution offices
  10. Content is professional and relevant to public legal services
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress platform with a modern tech stack including jQuery and Smart Slider 3 for interactive content. SEO is optimized using Yoast SEO plugin, and analytics are managed via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager with consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and loads with moderate performance. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of certain security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates areas for modernization. Hosting details are limited to registrar information, with no explicit hosting provider identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with verejnazaloba.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review verejnazaloba.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.