Skip to main content

Security report for ventraip.net.au

VentraIP Australia · Technology · Australia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VentraIP Australia is a leading digital service provider specializing in domain registration, web hosting, email hosting, SSL certificates, and website building solutions. Positioned as Australia's largest independent domain registrar, the company serves over 300,000 customers with a strong emphasis on local Australian support and trusted service. Their market position is reinforced by high customer satisfaction ratings across multiple platforms and a clear branding focus on being 100% Australian owned and operated. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Next.js and React, with good SEO and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and multiple security headers, though improvements can be made in TLS configuration and DNS security. Privacy compliance is basic with a clear privacy policy but no visible cookie consent mechanism. Overall, VentraIP demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ventraip.net.au

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ventraip.net.au, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ventraip.net.au.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VentraIP operates in the technology sector, targeting individuals, small businesses, and web professionals in Australia. Their business model centers on providing comprehensive online solutions including domain names, hosting, email, and security products. The company benefits from a strong local support team and a parent company, Nexigen Digital, which may provide additional resources and strategic direction. Their competitive advantages include transparent pricing, award-winning support, and a broad portfolio of services. The company actively promotes customer reviews and trust badges to enhance credibility. Growth indicators include a large customer base and active marketing campaigns. Partnerships and related domains are limited but include the parent company. The company maintains a professional and consistent brand image across its digital assets.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and several important security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. However, the SSL configuration lacks detailed protocol and cipher suite information, and HSTS preload is not enabled. DNSSEC and CAA records are not implemented, which are recommended for enhanced DNS and certificate security. No explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are found. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the provided data. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional DNS security measures and enhancing TLS configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HSTS preload and ensure HSTS header is active to enforce HTTPS strictly.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Add CAA DNS records to restrict certificate authorities authorized to issue certificates.
  4. Configure and enable strong TLS protocols and cipher suites to enhance SSL security.
  5. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, served by nginx. It uses SVG images and web fonts (woff/woff2) for performance and visual quality. Google Analytics is integrated for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance metrics indicate fast loading times. The site is hosted on a server with a single IPv4 address and uses custom nameservers. DNSSEC and CAA are not enabled, representing a technical gap in DNS security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained with opportunities for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ventraip.net.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ventraip.net.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.