Skip to main content

Security report for veka.cz

VEKA Holding · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VEKA Holding operates as a leading global manufacturer specializing in high-quality plastic profile systems for windows and doors. The company targets a professional audience including window manufacturers, architects, builders, and sellers, positioning itself as a market leader in its sector. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear branding and targeted navigation. Technically, the site employs modern frontend technologies such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, along with consent management tools like Usercentrics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of WHOIS registrant data, limits transparency and compliance visibility. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration, indicating room for improvement in security best practices. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching veka.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
90
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention veka.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for veka.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VEKA Holding's market positioning as a world-leading manufacturer of plastic profile systems is supported by its clear focus on multiple professional target groups. The business model centers on manufacturing and distributing specialized construction materials, with a strong emphasis on quality and industry leadership. The website's content and structure suggest a mature organization with a large operational scale, although specific company founding year or parent/subsidiary relationships are not disclosed. The use of modern web technologies and consent management indicates digital maturity, but the lack of explicit contact information and compliance documentation may impact customer trust and regulatory adherence. Strategic partnerships or related domains are not evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is moderate. While HTTPS is presumably enabled (given the URL scheme), no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and no security or incident response contact information is available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies reduces GDPR compliance confidence. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. The use of Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics indicates some level of user tracking and consent management, but the overall privacy compliance is weak. The site lacks a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which are best practices for security transparency. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible, suggesting potential gaps in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VEKA Holding
Description
Profilové systémy pro okna a dveře z vysoce kvalitního plastu od předního světového výrobce
Key services
Production of plastic profile systems for windows and doors, Distribution and support for manufacturers, architects, builders, and sellers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issue
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies and consent management tools
  6. Content is business-focused, targeting manufacturers, architects, builders, and sellers
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown
  8. No visible security or incident response contact information
  9. No certifications or compliance badges visible
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend frameworks including Nuxt.js and Vue.js, styled with Tailwind CSS. It leverages Google Tag Manager for analytics and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating an awareness of privacy regulations. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The absence of detected CMS or hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment. Technical debt is not evident from the provided data, but the lack of security headers and privacy documentation suggests areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with veka.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review veka.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.