Skip to main content

Security report for veis.ee

Eesti Lihaveisekasvatajate Ühistu · Manufacturing · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eesti Lihaveisekasvatajate Ühistu operates as a cooperative primarily focused on the purchase, sale, and brokerage of beef cattle in Estonia. Founded in 2015, it serves a significant network of over 200 cattle breeders and is a founding member of a larger association with 400+ members. The cooperative maintains a modern livestock collection center and targets both domestic and international markets. Their business model centers on providing reliable and professional services to cattle breeders, ensuring quality livestock for various purposes including breeding and meat production. Technically, the website is built on the Greativ CMS platform and employs modern web technologies such as JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content relevance, although accessibility features are basic. Hosting is provided by Zone Media OÜ, a known Estonian hosting provider, consistent with the domain registration data. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and client-side form validation but lacks visible security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is fully accessible. The business provides clear contact information but does not disclose incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its target audience of livestock breeders. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening would enhance its risk profile and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching veis.ee

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The cooperative holds a strong position in the Estonian beef cattle market, leveraging a network of breeders and a modern collection center. Its cooperative business model fosters trust and collaboration among members, supporting both traditional and organic livestock markets. Revenue streams likely include commissions on sales, direct livestock purchases, and rental services such as trailer hire. The presence of certifications and a professional website supports credibility. The cooperative’s partnerships and membership in larger associations indicate a well-integrated ecosystem. Growth potential exists through expanding export markets and enhancing digital services for members.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is implemented, and client-side validation is present, but the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which could delay response to security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. The use of third-party analytics and tracking services without clear privacy disclosures further impacts compliance. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy.
  4. Review and optimize SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption standards.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear data retention policies for analytics.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Eesti Lihaveisekasvatajate Ühistu
VAT number
EE101792314
Registration number
12849640
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eesti Lihaveisekasvatajate Ühistu
Description
Eesti lihaveisekasvatajate ühistu tegeleb peamiselt lihaveiste ostu, müügi ja vahendamisega. Ostame kõiki Eesti peamisi lihaveisetõugusi nuumale, tõuloomaks ja lihaks. Omame aastate pikkust lihaveiste ostu-müügi kogemust. Aitame leida kasvatajal enda loomadele parimat turgu.
Key services
Beef cattle purchase, Beef cattle sale, Brokerage services, Livestock collection center operations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Dropzone.js, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, Animate.css, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by classes and scripts)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by base href https://veis.ee/)
  • Form validation and AJAX submission with client-side checks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional cooperative site for Estonian beef cattle breeders.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and contact form.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and external analytics/tracking services.
  5. No security headers detected; security posture can be improved.
  6. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern CMS (Greativ) and integrates popular front-end libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and Animate.css, providing a responsive and visually appealing user experience. Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK are used for analytics and marketing, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Hosting is stable with Zone Media OÜ, a local Estonian provider. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are technical debts that should be addressed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but can benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with veis.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review veis.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.