Skip to main content

Security report for veikaliem.lv

Ecom20 · E-commerce · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VEIKALIEM.LV is a Latvian e-commerce platform primarily serving as a supplier login portal for retail businesses. The platform facilitates supplier account management and product listings, targeting B2B customers within the regional market. The website is basic in design and content, focusing on functionality over marketing or public information. Technically, it uses a custom UI framework named Elephant, Google Fonts, and PHP backend scripts, but lacks modern CMS or advanced platform integrations. Security posture is minimal with no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. Contact information is clearly provided, indicating some level of business credibility. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and content richness to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching veikaliem.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
67
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention veikaliem.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
91
Employees
0
Customers
91
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
27%

14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for veikaliem.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the e-commerce sector with a focus on supplier-store interactions, likely generating revenue through supplier registrations and platform usage fees. The market position appears niche and regional, with limited public-facing marketing content. The company uses ecom20.com as a partner domain, suggesting a broader ecosystem or parent company relationship. The platform targets suppliers and retail businesses in Latvia, with a small company size inferred from the limited scope and content. No certifications or formal trust signals are present, which may impact competitive positioning. Growth potential depends on improving digital maturity and expanding service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level. Key weaknesses include absence of HTTPS enforcement in the provided data, lack of security headers, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The login form uses basic JavaScript handling and password input with autocomplete disabled, which is positive but insufficient alone. No anti-bot or CSRF protections are evident. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture requires urgent enhancements to protect user data and build trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Introduce CSRF tokens and rate limiting on login forms to prevent abuse.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ecom20
Description
An e-commerce platform targeting suppliers and stores, providing login access for suppliers to manage their accounts and products.
Key services
Supplier login and account management, Password recovery, Supplier registration (fast and full, though hidden)
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Roboto), Custom JS elephant.js
Frameworks
Elephant UI framework (custom or third-party)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Password input uses autocomplete='new-password'
  • Login form uses JavaScript to handle submission

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a supplier login portal with minimal public content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is provided clearly on login page.
  4. No social media or marketing integrations detected.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in provided data.
  6. No WAF or blocking detected; site is accessible.
  7. Technical implementation is basic with custom UI framework.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom UI framework named Elephant with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Google Fonts. Backend appears to be PHP-based. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization or SEO features detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no ARIA roles or semantic enhancements visible. No CMS or third-party platform integrations are evident. The site lacks analytics and marketing tools, indicating low digital maturity. Technical risks include outdated security practices and potential exposure to automated attacks due to missing protections.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with veikaliem.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review veikaliem.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.