Skip to main content

Security report for vegolink.com

Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website vegolink.com currently serves as a single-page announcement indicating the discontinuation of all Vegolink domains and associated social media accounts, effectively signaling the cessation of the Vegolink trade name. There is no additional business information, services, or contact details provided, which limits the ability to assess the company's market position or business model. The domain is registered through a reputable registrar with a creation date in 2020, suggesting a relatively recent establishment or rebranding. From a technical perspective, the website is minimalistic with basic HTML and CSS styling, lacking any advanced frameworks, scripts, or analytics tools. The site appears accessible without any WAF or security challenges but does not implement common security best practices such as HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or privacy policies. Mobile optimization is basic but functional given the simple layout. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and privacy compliance documentation. No contact or incident response information is available, which is a concern for user trust and regulatory compliance. The lack of external links, social media presence, or business contact details further reduces credibility and user engagement potential. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile due to its limited content and lack of data collection but suffers from poor business credibility and security posture. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding contact and incident response information, and enhancing content quality to rebuild trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vegolink.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vegolink.com appears to be a small-scale or possibly defunct business entity as indicated by the announcement of domain and social media discontinuation. The lack of business details, services, or customer engagement tools suggests minimal current operations. The domain registration through Ascio Technologies in Denmark aligns with a European presence but no direct company information is disclosed. There are no visible partnerships, subsidiaries, or certifications. The business model and revenue streams cannot be determined from the available data. The website does not leverage marketing or analytics tools, indicating low digital maturity and minimal online presence.

Security posture

The website lacks fundamental security measures such as HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and privacy compliance documentation. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The WHOIS data is transparent and domain status clientTransferProhibited is a positive security indicator. However, the absence of DNSSEC and other advanced security configurations is noted. The minimal content and lack of forms reduce attack surface but also limit user trust. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations cannot be confirmed due to missing policies and contact information. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires significant improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance transparency.
  3. Add clear contact information including email and phone for customer support and incident response.
  4. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Enhance website content and navigation to improve user experience and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website displays a single announcement stating that all Vegolink domains and associated social media accounts are discontinued and that the Vegolink trade name is no longer available for use.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website only contains a single announcement page with no additional content or navigation.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present.
  4. No external links or social media links detected.
  5. No scripts or analytics detected in the HTML content.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details provided.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and domain is moderately aged.
  8. Website indicates discontinuation of all Vegolink domains and social media accounts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses simple HTML and CSS without any detected JavaScript libraries, frameworks, or CMS platforms. No analytics or tracking scripts are present. The domain uses name servers ns.zone.eu, ns2.zone.ee, and ns3.zonedata.net, but hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content. Mobile optimization is basic but adequate for the single announcement page. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags beyond title and absence of structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but the high contrast design aids readability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vegolink.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vegolink.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.