Skip to main content

Security report for veba.cz

Veba, textilní závody a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Veba, textilní závody a.s. is a Czech textile manufacturer specializing in high-quality cotton Jacquard textiles, African brocades, and related textile products for home and hotel use. The company leverages a century-long tradition combined with modern technology to serve both B2B and B2C markets. Their product portfolio includes home textiles, hotel textiles, Arabian headscarves, technical textiles, and hotel resort services, positioning them as a diversified player in the manufacturing and retail sectors within the Czech Republic. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content for their target audience. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. However, some accessibility features could be improved. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or less common platform. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, alongside a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Security headers are not explicitly detected, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating room for improvement in security transparency and defense-in-depth. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but is mitigated by the presence of certifications and clear contact information. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy with moderate user tracking via Google services. The lack of WHOIS transparency and some missing security policies are notable gaps. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and improving accessibility to further strengthen the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching veba.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Veba operates as a medium-sized manufacturing and retail company with a strong heritage in textile production. Their market positioning as a leading Czech manufacturer with ISO certifications provides competitive advantage and trust. The business model integrates manufacturing with direct retail through online and physical stores, targeting both domestic and international customers interested in quality textiles. The company maintains partnerships with related domains and promotes its products via social media and trade fairs. Growth indicators include active news updates and diversified product lines. The partnership ecosystem includes related sites for African brocade and hotel resort services, enhancing brand reach and service offerings.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, which are positive controls against common threats. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness communication. GDPR compliance is indicated by privacy and cookie policies, but no dedicated security policy or data protection officer contact is found. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces moderate tracking but no obvious privacy violations. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved with enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve browser security.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to enhance transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Improve website accessibility features to comply with standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Veba, textilní závody a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Veba, textilní závody a.s.
Description
VEBA, Textile Mills Ltd. BROUMOV is a leading Czech manufacturer of cotton Jacquard textiles with a hundred years tradition and modern technology.
Key services
Cotton Jacquard textiles manufacturing, Home Textile products, Hotel Textile products, African Brocade textiles, Arabian Headscarves, Technical Textiles, Hotel Resort services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery 3.4.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Ekko Lightbox, UberGallery, CookieConsent.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. Website uses modern technologies and has a professional design.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram.
  9. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap 4.4.1 and jQuery 3.4.1, supported by Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The use of Google reCAPTCHA protects forms from automated abuse. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site uses cookie consent with opt-in, aligning with privacy regulations. Technical debt appears low but could be reduced by updating libraries and adding security headers. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with veba.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review veba.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.