Skip to main content

Security report for vci-protection.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.vci-protection.cz is a minimal WordPress site with default placeholder content and no substantive business information or services described. The lack of WHOIS data suggests the domain is either privacy protected or unregistered, which combined with minimal content, indicates the site may be under development or inactive. Technically, the site uses WordPress with the Twenty Twenty-One theme and basic modern web technologies. HTTPS is enabled, but no advanced security headers or policies are present. There is no evidence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor any contact or incident response information, which limits compliance and trust. Overall, the site has a low security posture and minimal business credibility.

Scanned

5 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high in the checks that completed. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vci-protection.cz

Only DNS and email could be checked this time. Monitoring re-checks every day and emails you when something material changes.

Daily monitoring

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Email security
65
DNS health
85
Average
75

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of business descriptions, contact details, or certifications, the site does not provide meaningful business intelligence. The domain appears to be small scale, targeting a general audience in the Czech Republic, but lacks any clear market positioning or services. No partnerships or related domains are identified. The site likely serves as a placeholder or initial setup for future content.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no security headers detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and incident response channels indicates poor compliance with GDPR and security best practices. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the content, but the lack of security controls and transparency is a concern. The site should implement standard security headers, privacy policies, and contact mechanisms to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add clear contact information including business email and phone numbers.
  3. Configure standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a basic WordPress site with a default introductory post welcoming users to WordPress. No business description or services are provided.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
WordPress Twenty Twenty-One Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a basic WordPress installation with default content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or business details provided.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. No social media or external business links found except WordPress and CZ NIC references.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Twenty Twenty-One theme. It uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with emoji support scripts. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. No analytics or advertising scripts are present, indicating minimal tracking. The hosting provider is not identifiable from the content. The site lacks SEO optimization beyond basic meta tags and RSS feeds.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vci-protection.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vci-protection.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.